The logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonism

The logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonism;
The logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonism;
The logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonism;
The logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonism;
A interpretação lógica do “Parmênides” de Platão no médio platonismo

dc.creatorBonuglia, Chiara
dc.date2020-04-15
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T19:49:02Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T19:49:02Z
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43317
dc.identifier10.5902/2179378643317
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8942226
dc.description In this paper, I will show some arguments that reinforce the idea that the Parmenides was considered a logical dialogue during the Middle Platonism. I will consider what some authors say, although in different ages, about how the Parmenides of Plato has been read. My aim is also to display that they were in a general accordance: actually, given these concordances, the probability that this work was classified among the logical dialogues becomes much more plausible. The main source for establishing this is represented by Proclus who, in his Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, discusses about the traditions of interpretation connected with this dialogue, proposing a classification in which is included also the ‘logical way’. On the basis of the analysis of some passages of Alcinous’ Didaskalikos (ch. 6), and of some references present in Diogenes Laertius’ Vitae Philosophorum (III, 49), and given some indications in Albinus (Isagoge, III, 148, 19 ff., VI, 151, 5-7), it is possible to hypothesize with a certain degree of truth that the Parmenides, for some middleplatonists, in some respects, and more generally for the Middleplatonism, represented an ‘explanatory dialogue’ or ‘expository dialogue’ (ὑφεγηματικός) which contained the indications to learn the logical method, while at the same time providing an example of how to exercise in order to learn it.de-DE
dc.descriptionIn this paper, I will show some arguments that reinforce the idea that the Parmenides was considered a logical dialogue during the Middle Platonism. I will consider what some authors say, although in different ages, about how the Parmenides of Plato has been read. My aim is also to display that they were in a general accordance: actually, given these concordances, the probability that this work was classified among the logical dialogues becomes much more plausible. The main source for establishing this is represented by Proclus who, in his Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, discusses about the traditions of interpretation connected with this dialogue, proposing a classification in which is included also the ‘logical way’. On the basis of the analysis of some passages of Alcinous’ Didaskalikos (ch. 6), and of some references present in Diogenes Laertius’ Vitae Philosophorum (III, 49), and given some indications in Albinus (Isagoge, III, 148, 19 ff., VI, 151, 5-7), it is possible to hypothesize with a certain degree of truth that the Parmenides, for some middleplatonists, in some respects, and more generally for the Middleplatonism, represented an ‘explanatory dialogue’ or ‘expository dialogue’ (ὑφεγηματικός) which contained the indications to learn the logical method, while at the same time providing an example of how to exercise in order to learn it.en-US
dc.descriptionIn this paper, I will show some arguments that reinforce the idea that the Parmenides was considered a logical dialogue during the Middle Platonism. I will consider what some authors say, although in different ages, about how the Parmenides of Plato has been read. My aim is also to display that they were in a general accordance: actually, given these concordances, the probability that this work was classified among the logical dialogues becomes much more plausible. The main source for establishing this is represented by Proclus who, in his Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, discusses about the traditions of interpretation connected with this dialogue, proposing a classification in which is included also the ‘logical way’. On the basis of the analysis of some passages of Alcinous’ Didaskalikos (ch. 6), and of some references present in Diogenes Laertius’ Vitae Philosophorum (III, 49), and given some indications in Albinus (Isagoge, III, 148, 19 ff., VI, 151, 5-7), it is possible to hypothesize with a certain degree of truth that the Parmenides, for some middleplatonists, in some respects, and more generally for the Middleplatonism, represented an ‘explanatory dialogue’ or ‘expository dialogue’ (ὑφεγηματικός) which contained the indications to learn the logical method, while at the same time providing an example of how to exercise in order to learn it.es-ES
dc.descriptionIn this paper, I will show some arguments that reinforce the idea that the Parmenides was considered a logical dialogue during the Middle Platonism. I will consider what some authors say, although in different ages, about how the Parmenides of Plato has been read. My aim is also to display that they were in a general accordance: actually, given these concordances, the probability that this work was classified among the logical dialogues becomes much more plausible. The main source for establishing this is represented by Proclus who, in his Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, discusses about the traditions of interpretation connected with this dialogue, proposing a classification in which is included also the ‘logical way’. On the basis of the analysis of some passages of Alcinous’ Didaskalikos (ch. 6), and of some references present in Diogenes Laertius’ Vitae Philosophorum (III, 49), and given some indications in Albinus (Isagoge, III, 148, 19 ff., VI, 151, 5-7), it is possible to hypothesize with a certain degree of truth that the Parmenides, for some middleplatonists, in some respects, and more generally for the Middleplatonism, represented an ‘explanatory dialogue’ or ‘expository dialogue’ (ὑφεγηματικός) which contained the indications to learn the logical method, while at the same time providing an example of how to exercise in order to learn it.fr-FR
dc.descriptionIn this paper, I will show some arguments that reinforce the idea that the Parmenides was considered a logical dialogue during the Middle Platonism. I will consider what some authors say, although in different ages, about how the Parmenides of Plato has been read. My aim is also to display that they were in a general accordance: actually, given these concordances, the probability that this work was classified among the logical dialogues becomes much more plausible. The main source for establishing this is represented by Proclus who, in his Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides, discusses about the traditions of interpretation connected with this dialogue, proposing a classification in which is included also the ‘logical way’. On the basis of the analysis of some passages of Alcinous’ Didaskalikos (ch. 6), and of some references present in Diogenes Laertius’ Vitae Philosophorum (III, 49), and given some indications in Albinus (Isagoge, III, 148, 19 ff., VI, 151, 5-7), it is possible to hypothesize with a certain degree of truth that the Parmenides, for some middleplatonists, in some respects, and more generally for the Middleplatonism, represented an ‘explanatory dialogue’ or ‘expository dialogue’ (ὑφεγηματικός) which contained the indications to learn the logical method, while at the same time providing an example of how to exercise in order to learn it.it-IT
dc.descriptionNeste artigo, mostrarei alguns argumentos que reforçam a ideia de que o Parmênides foi considerado um diálogo lógico durante o médio platonismo. Vou considerar o que alguns autores dizem, embora em diferentes épocas, sobre como o Parmênides de Platão foi lido. Meu objetivo é também mostrar que eles estiveram em um acordo geral: na verdade, dadas essas concordâncias, a probabilidade de que esta obra tenha sido classificada entre os diálogos lógicos se torna muito mais plausível. A principal fonte para estabelecer isso é representada por Proclo, que, em seu Comentário sobre o Parmênides de Platão, discute as tradições de interpretação relacionadas a este diálogo, propondo uma classificação na qual também está incluído o ‘modo lógico’. Com base na análise de algumas passagens do Didaskalikos de Alcino (cap. 6) e de algumas referências presentes na Vitae Philosophorum de Diógenes Laércio (III, 49), e com algumas indicações em Albino (Isagoge, III, 148, 19 e segs., VI, 151, 5-7), é possível supor com certo grau de verdade que o Parmênides, para alguns médios platonistas, em alguns aspectos, e mais geralmente para o médio platonismo, representava um ‘diálogo explicativo’ ou ‘diálogo expositivo’ (ὑφεγηματικός) que continha as indicações para aprender o método lógico, fornecendo ao mesmo tempo um exemplo de como se exercitar para aprendê-lo.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Mariapt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43317/pdf
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43317/html
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2020 Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofiapt-BR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Bd. 11 Nr. 1 (2020): Dossier Der "Parmenides" Platons + Schopenhauer-Studien; 111 - 117de-DE
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Dossier Plato's "Parmenides" + Schopenhauerian Studies; 111 - 117en-US
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Dossier El "Parménides" de Platon + Estudios Schopenhauerianos; 111 - 117es-ES
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 No 1 (2020): Dossiê O "Parmênides" de Platão + Estudos Schopenhauerianos; 111 - 117fr-FR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; V. 11 N. 1 (2020): Dossier Il "Parmenide" di Platone + Studi Schopenhaueriani; 111 - 117it-IT
dc.sourceVoluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 1 (2020): Dossiê O "Parmênides" de Platão + Estudos Schopenhauerianos; 111 - 117pt-BR
dc.source2179-3786
dc.subjectParmenidesde-DE
dc.subjectMiddle Platonismde-DE
dc.subjectProclusde-DE
dc.subjectLogical interpretationde-DE
dc.subjectParmenidesen-US
dc.subjectMiddle Platonismen-US
dc.subjectProclusen-US
dc.subjectLogical interpretationen-US
dc.subjectParmenideses-ES
dc.subjectMiddle Platonismes-ES
dc.subjectProcluses-ES
dc.subjectLogical interpretationes-ES
dc.subjectParmenidesfr-FR
dc.subjectMiddle Platonismfr-FR
dc.subjectProclusfr-FR
dc.subjectLogical interpretationfr-FR
dc.subjectParmenidesit-IT
dc.subjectMiddle Platonismit-IT
dc.subjectProclusit-IT
dc.subjectLogical interpretationit-IT
dc.subjectParmênidespt-BR
dc.subjectMédio platonismopt-BR
dc.subjectProclopt-BR
dc.subjectInterpretação lógicapt-BR
dc.titleThe logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonismde-DE
dc.titleThe logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonismen-US
dc.titleThe logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonismes-ES
dc.titleThe logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonismfr-FR
dc.titleThe logical interpretation of Plato's "Parmenides" in the Middle Platonismit-IT
dc.titleA interpretação lógica do “Parmênides” de Platão no médio platonismopt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución