Quackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhauer

Quackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhauer;
Quackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhauer;
Quackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhauer;
Quackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhauer;
O charlatanismo como problema estético-filosófico em Schopenhauer

dc.creatorCarvalho, Danilo Bilate de
dc.date2019-12-18
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T19:48:46Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T19:48:46Z
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/39684
dc.identifier10.5902/2179378639684
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8942177
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this paper is to present the philosophical questions that revolve around the ordinary Schopenhauerian accusation of quackery against his opponents. The study of these satellite-questions shows that quackery can be understood as a philosophical problem and not merely an offense empty of theoretical relevance, as commonly understood. They can be summarized as aesthetic or rhetorical questions, because they problematize the style of the philosophical text, its use and its communicative function. Close to the pedant and the sophist, the charlatan is one who abuses obscurity because of his distancing from concreteness by an option for abstract writing.de-DE
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this paper is to present the philosophical questions that revolve around the ordinary Schopenhauerian accusation of quackery against his opponents. The study of these satellite-questions shows that quackery can be understood as a philosophical problem and not merely an offense empty of theoretical relevance, as commonly understood. They can be summarized as aesthetic or rhetorical questions, because they problematize the style of the philosophical text, its use and its communicative function. Close to the pedant and the sophist, the charlatan is one who abuses obscurity because of his distancing from concreteness by an option for abstract writing.en-US
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this paper is to present the philosophical questions that revolve around the ordinary Schopenhauerian accusation of quackery against his opponents. The study of these satellite-questions shows that quackery can be understood as a philosophical problem and not merely an offense empty of theoretical relevance, as commonly understood. They can be summarized as aesthetic or rhetorical questions, because they problematize the style of the philosophical text, its use and its communicative function. Close to the pedant and the sophist, the charlatan is one who abuses obscurity because of his distancing from concreteness by an option for abstract writing.es-ES
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this paper is to present the philosophical questions that revolve around the ordinary Schopenhauerian accusation of quackery against his opponents. The study of these satellite-questions shows that quackery can be understood as a philosophical problem and not merely an offense empty of theoretical relevance, as commonly understood. They can be summarized as aesthetic or rhetorical questions, because they problematize the style of the philosophical text, its use and its communicative function. Close to the pedant and the sophist, the charlatan is one who abuses obscurity because of his distancing from concreteness by an option for abstract writing.fr-FR
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this paper is to present the philosophical questions that revolve around the ordinary Schopenhauerian accusation of quackery against his opponents. The study of these satellite-questions shows that quackery can be understood as a philosophical problem and not merely an offense empty of theoretical relevance, as commonly understood. They can be summarized as aesthetic or rhetorical questions, because they problematize the style of the philosophical text, its use and its communicative function. Close to the pedant and the sophist, the charlatan is one who abuses obscurity because of his distancing from concreteness by an option for abstract writing.it-IT
dc.descriptionO objetivo deste texto é o de apresentar as questões filosóficas que giram em torno da acusação schopenhaueriana corriqueira de charlatanismo contra seus adversários. O estudo dessas questões-satélites mostra que o charlatanismo pode ser compreendido como um problema filosófico e não mero xingamento vazio de relevância teórica, como se entende comumente. Elas podem ser resumidas como questões estéticas ou retóricas, porque problematizam o estilo do texto filosófico, o seu uso e sua função comunicativa. Próximo do pedante e do sofista, o charlatão é aquele que abusa da obscuridade por conta de seu afastamento da concretude por uma opção pela escrita abstrata.  pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Mariapt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/39684/pdf
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/39684/html
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2019 Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofiapt-BR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Bd. 10 Nr. 3 (2019): Dossier Philosophien des Gedächtnis + Schopenhauer-Studien; 199 - 211de-DE
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019): Dossier Philosophies of Memory + Schopenhauerian Studies; 199 - 211en-US
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2019): Dossier Philosophies of Memory + Schopenhauerian Studies; 199 - 211es-ES
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 10 No 3 (2019): Dossiê Filosofias da Memória + Estudos Schopenhaurianos; 199 - 211fr-FR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; V. 10 N. 3 (2019): Dossier Filosofie della memoria + Studi Schopenhaueriani; 199 - 211it-IT
dc.sourceVoluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 10 n. 3 (2019): Dossiê Filosofias da Memória + Estudos Schopenhaurianos; 199 - 211pt-BR
dc.source2179-3786
dc.subjectStylede-DE
dc.subjectCommunicationde-DE
dc.subjectPedantryde-DE
dc.subjectObscurityde-DE
dc.subjectStyleen-US
dc.subjectCommunicationen-US
dc.subjectPedantryen-US
dc.subjectObscurityen-US
dc.subjectStylees-ES
dc.subjectCommunicationes-ES
dc.subjectPedantryes-ES
dc.subjectObscurityes-ES
dc.subjectStylefr-FR
dc.subjectCommunicationfr-FR
dc.subjectPedantryfr-FR
dc.subjectObscurityfr-FR
dc.subjectStyleit-IT
dc.subjectCommunicationit-IT
dc.subjectPedantryit-IT
dc.subjectObscurityit-IT
dc.subjectEstilopt-BR
dc.subjectComunicaçãopt-BR
dc.subjectPedantismopt-BR
dc.subjectObscuridadept-BR
dc.titleQuackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhauerde-DE
dc.titleQuackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhaueren-US
dc.titleQuackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhaueres-ES
dc.titleQuackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhauerfr-FR
dc.titleQuackery as an aesthetic-philosophical problem in Schopenhauerit-IT
dc.titleO charlatanismo como problema estético-filosófico em Schopenhauerpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución