Article
Diagnostic performance of a single and duplicate Kato-Katz, Mini-FLOTAC, FECPAK(G2) and qPCR for the detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in three endemic countries
Registro en:
COOLS, Piet et al. Diagnostic performance of a single and duplicate Kato-Katz, Mini-FLOTAC, FECPAKG2 and qPCR for the detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in three endemic countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis., v. 13, n. 8, e0007446, 2019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007446.
1935-2735
10.1371/journal.pntd.0007446
Autor
Cools, Piet
Vlaminck, Johnny
Albonico, Marco
Ame, Shaali
Ayana, Mio
Antonio, Barrios Perez José
Cringoli, Giuseppe
Dana, Daniel
Keiser, Jennifer
Maurelli, Maria P
Maya, Catalina
Matoso, Leonardo F
Montresor, Antonio
Mekonnen, Zeleke
Mirams, Greg
Oliveira, Rodrigo Corrêa de
Pinto, Simone A
Rinaldi, Laura
Sayasone, Somphou
Thomas, Eurion
Verweij, Jaco J
Vercruysse, Jozef
Levecke, Bruno
Resumen
Background: Because the success of deworming programs targeting soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) is evaluated through the periodically assessment of prevalence and infection intensities, the use of the correct diagnostic method is of utmost importance. The STH community has recently published for each phase of a deworming program the minimal criteria that a potential diagnostic method needs to meet, the so-called target product profiles (TPPs).
Methodology: We compared the diagnostic performance of a single Kato-Katz (reference method) with that of other microscopy-based methods (duplicate Kato-Katz, Mini-FLOTAC and FECPAK(G2)) and one DNA-based method (qPCR) for the detection and quantification of STH infections in three drug efficacy trials in Ethiopia, Lao PDR, and Tanzania. Furthermore, we evaluated a selection of minimal diagnostic criteria of the TPPs.
Principal findings: All diagnostic methods showed a clinical sensitivity of >= 90% for all STH infections of moderate-to-heavy intensities. For infections of very low intensity, only qPCR resulted in a sensitivity that was superior to a single Kato-Katz for all STHs. Compared to the reference method, both Mini-FLOTAC and FECPAK(G2) resulted in significantly lower fecal egg counts for some STHs, leading to a substantial underestimation of the infection intensity. For qPCR, there was a positive significant correlation between the egg counts of a single Kato-Katz and the DNA concentration.
Conclusions/Significance: Our results indicate that the diagnostic performance of a single Kato-Katz is underestimated by the community and that diagnostic specific thresholds to classify intensity of infection are warranted for Mini-FLOTAC, FECPAK(G2) and qPCR. When we strictly apply the TPPs, Kato-Katz is the only microscopy-based method that meets the minimal diagnostic criteria for application in the planning, monitoring and evaluation phase of an STH program. qPCR is the only method that could be considered in the phase that aims to seek confirmation for cessation of program.