Article
Bladder exstrophy: an epidemiologic study from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and an overview of the literature
Registro en:
SIFFEL, Csaba; et al. Bladder Exstrophy: An Epidemiologic Study From the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and an Overview of the Literature. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. , v. 0, n.4, p.321–332, Nov. 2011.
1552-4868
10.1002/ajmg.c.30316
1552-4876
Autor
Siffel, Csaba
Correa, Adolfo
Amar, Emmanuelle
Bakker, Marian K.
Bermejo-Sánchez, Eva
Bianca, Sebastiano
Castilla, Eduardo E.
Clementi, Maurizio
Cocchi, Guido
Csáky-Szunyogh, Melinda
Feldkamp, Marcia L.
Landau, Danielle
Leoncini, Emanuele
Li, Zhu
Lowry, R. Brian
Marengo, Lisa K.
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
Morgan, Margery
Mutchinick, Osvaldo M.
Pierini, Anna
Rissmann, Anke
Ritvanen, Annukka
Scarano, Gioacchino
Szabova, Elena
Olney, Richard S.
Resumen
Bladder exstrophy (BE) is a complex congenital anomaly characterized by a defect in the closure of the lower abdominal wall and bladder. We aimed to provide an overview of the literature and conduct an epidemiologic study to describe the prevalence, and maternal and case characteristics of BE. We used data from 22 participating member programs of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR). All cases were reviewed and classified as isolated, syndrome, and multiple congenital anomalies. We estimated the total prevalence of BE and calculated the frequency and odds ratios for various maternal and case characteristics. A total of 546 cases with BE were identified among 26,355,094 births. The total prevalence of BE was 2.07 per 100,000 births (95% CI: 1.90-2.25) and varied between 0.52 and 4.63 among surveillance programs participating in the study. BE was nearly twice as common among male as among female cases. The proportion of isolated cases was 71%. Prevalence appeared to increase with increasing categories of maternal age, particularly among isolated cases. The total prevalence of BE showed some variations by geographical region, which is most likely attributable to differences in registration of cases. The higher total prevalence among male cases and older mothers, especially among isolated cases, warrants further attention. 2030-01-01