Tese
Elaboração e validação de conteúdo do instrumento para mensurar a intensificação do trabalho da enfermagem: estudo metodológico
Fecha
2022-08-26Autor
Arboit, Eder Luis
Institución
Resumen
Introduction: nowadays, workers from different sectors have been influenced in their work
processes, which can be attributed to the capitalist/neoliberal models, with emphasis on
aspects such as: precariousness of work, fragility in work relationships, multifunctionality and
versatility requirement, as well as an increase in the pace of work. In the area of health and, in
particular, in nursing, workers have also been impacted by these changes, which have resulted
in the intensification of work. Objective: to elaborate and validate the content of the
instrument to measure the intensification of nursing work. Method: methodological study
carried out in five stages: I - Clearly determine what you want to measure; II – General a pool
of items; III - Determine the measurement format; IV - Have the set of items reviewed by
experts; V - Consider the inclusion of validation items. The instrument elaboration process is
anchored in the systematic literature review (2019-2020) and in the exploratory-descriptive
study, with a qualitative approach (2021), which allowed to elucidate the content that best
represents the items and domains related to the investigated construct. Study participants were
18 nursing workers in the exploratory stage (item elaboration), 12 PhDs who composed the
committee of judges/experts and 43 nursing workers in the pre-test stage. Data processing
took place through content analysis and calculation of the Content Validity Index. Results:
the integrative review study identified factors related to the intensification of nursing work in
the hospital environment, which refer to institutional/labor, human and clinical aspects. The
exploratory study showed that, from the perspective of nursing workers, the intensification of
work is linked to the lack of materials and equipment, the patient's clinical condition,
weaknesses in professional training and qualification, intensified pace and work demands;
weaknesses in management and interprofessional collaboration. The results of the mentioned
steps allowed the elaboration of 62 items which were submitted to the evaluation of the expert
committee, in a single round. The CVI ranged from 0.58 to 1.00, excluding items with a value
lower than 0.80. The CVI of the domains ranged from 0.94 to 0.97. In the pre-test with the
target population, the CVI ranged from 0.90 to 1.00. After making the adjustments, the final
instrument contains 60 items distributed in seven domains. The instrument in its complete
formation had a CVI of 0.95. Conclusion: the instrument is considered valid by the
committee of judges/experts and by the target population, contributing to clinical and
scientific practice. It constitutes an innovative tool to be used to measure the intensification of
work in the context of nursing in the hospital environment, being ready for the initial
examination of the performance of the items, through factor analysis.