| dc.description | Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal processing methods used to assess combat sports are heterogeneous.
This research aims to compare the electromyography peak (peak EMG) in taekwondo athletes with five processing methods.
Secondarily, the coefficient of variation (CV) and the noise percentage regarding the peak EMG (NPRP) were compared. The
sEMG record of eight leg muscles of sixteen athletes (12 male and 4 female, ages 20.31+4.1 years) was consulted. The
processing methods were: a) Smoothing 1, b) Smoothing 2, c) Root mean square (RMS) 1, d) RMS 2, and e) Empirical mode
decomposition (EMD). Results indicate that the peak EMG differs among Smoothing 1 vs. EMD; Smoothing 2 vs. EMD;
Smoothing 1 vs. RMS 2; Smoothing 2 vs. RMS 2; Smoothing 1 vs. RMS 1; RMS 1 vs. RMS 2; RMS 1 vs. EMD, and RMS 2 vs.
EMD. For all cases p<.05 in seven of the eight muscles studied. No differences were found for the CV. The EMD NPRP was
lower than the other methods analyzed (p<.05). As a conclusion, there are differences among the studied methods and
should be considered when interpreting the peak EMG. The EMD seems to be a useful alternative for reducing noise and
artifact movement. | |
