Capitulo de libro
NONCOMMUTATIVE VERSIONS OF PROHOROV AND VARADHAN THEOREMS
STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS AND MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS II. 4TH INTERNATIONAL ANESTOC WORKSHOP IN SANTIAGO, CHILE
Registro en:
3010005
978-3-0348-9405-0
978-3-0348-8018-3
Autor
Comman, Henri Marcel Paul
Institución
Resumen
In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X).In [7], we introduced a notion of capacities on a C*-algebra U, endowed the set of capacities with the narrow and vague topologies, and studied relative compactness in various classes of capacities. This allowed us to formulate a large deviation principle for a net of capacities in terms of convergence of capacities (extending the usual definition for a net (? ?)> ?>0 of regular probability measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space X). FONDECYT 162 FONDECYT