Correspondence between instructions, performance, and self-descriptions in a conditional discrimination task: The effects of feedback and type of matching response

Abstract

Four experiments were designed to evaluate the functional correspondence of effective performance with correct or incorrect instructions and correct or incorrect self-descriptions in a first-order matching-to-sample task. These studies included verbal or nonverbal matching responses and provided feedback or not after the participants described their matching performance. The results point to three possible discrimination learning processes in humans: (1) learning through instructions, with a possible insensitivity to consequences unless the correspondence between instructions and feedback breaks down; (2) learning through feedback, with an inability of participants to describe their own behavior; and (3) a genuine "rule-governed" behavior consisting of successful task performance and explicit verbal behavior describing the actual contingencies effective for such performance.