Artículo de revista
Recent developments and current status of transcatheter aortic valve replacement practice in Latin America – the WRITTEN LATAM study
Fecha
2022Registro en:
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022; 118(6):1085-1096
10.36660/abc.20210327
Autor
Melo Bernardi, Fernando Luiz de
Barbosa Ribeiro, Henrique
Nombela Franco, Luis
Cerrato, Enrico
Maluenda Razeto, Gabriel Antonio
Nazif, Tamim
Alves Lemos, Pedro
Sztejfman, Matías
Lamelas, Pablo
Echeverri, Darío
Cartaxo Queiroga Lopes, Marcelo Antonio
Brito, Fabio Sandoli de
Abizaid, Alexandre A.
Mangione, José A.
Eltchaninoff, Helene
Søndergaard, Lars
Rodes Cabau, Josep
Institución
Resumen
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a worldwide adopted procedure with rapidly evolving
practices. Regional and temporal variations are expected to be found.
Objective: To compare TAVR practice in Latin America with that around the world and to assess its changes in Latin America
from 2015 to 2020.
Methods: A survey was applied to global TAVR centers between March and September 2015, and again to Latin-American
centers between July 2019 and January 2020. The survey consisted of questions addressing: i) center’s general information;
ii) pre-TAVR evaluation; iii) procedural techniques; iv) post-TAVR management; v) follow-up. Answers from the 2015 survey
of Latin-American centers (LATAM15) were compared with those of other centers around the world (WORLD15) and with
the 2020 updated Latin-American survey (LATAM20). A 5% level of significance was adopted for statistical analysis.
Results: 250 centers participated in the 2015 survey (LATAM15=29; WORLD15=221) and 46 in the LATAM20. Combined
centers experience accounted for 73 707 procedures, with WORLD15 centers performing, on average, 6- and 3-times more
procedures than LATAM15 and LATAM20 centers, respectively. LATAM centers performed less minimalistic TAVR than
WORLD15 centers, but there was a significant increase in less invasive procedures after 5 years in Latin-American centers.
For postprocedural care, a lower period of telemetry and maintenance of temporary pacing wire, along with less utilization
of dual antiplatelet therapy was observed in LATAM20 centers.
Conclusion: Despite still having a much lower number of procedures, many aspects of TAVR practice in Latin-American
centers have evolved in recent years, followingthe trend observed in developed country centers.