Artículos de revistas
Habitat quality, not habitat amount, drives mammalian habitat use in the Brazilian Pantanal
Fecha
2021-01-01Registro en:
Landscape Ecology.
1572-9761
0921-2973
10.1007/s10980-021-01280-0
2-s2.0-85107863943
Autor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Colorado State University (CSU)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
National Institute for Space Research (INPE)
Institución
Resumen
Context: An understanding of species-habitat relationships is required to assess the impacts of habitat fragmentation and degradation. To date, habitat modeling in fragmented landscapes has relied on landscape composition and configuration metrics and the importance of habitat quality in determining species distributions has not been sufficiently explored. Objectives: We evaluated how habitat use by herbivores and frugivorous mammals is shaped by a potential interaction of habitat amount and quality in the Brazilian Pantanal wetland. We also assessed if the contribution of habitat quality to species´ habitat use varies according to the species sensitivity to habitat loss. Methods: We combined mammal detection data obtained from camera traps with thematic maps to estimate the amount of habitat and measured habitat quality using local environment variables and distance to waterbodies. Specifically, we used a single-season occupancy approach to evaluate the relative support of univariate, additive, and interactive relationships between species-specific habitat use and measures of habitat quality and quantity. Results: Habitat quality was more important than habitat amount in determining species habitat use (occupancy) in a naturally fragmented landscape. Habitat quality alone was the best predictor of habitat use for two of the six species (white lipped peccary and collared peccary), but no species’ habitat use was explained solely by habitat amount. Habitat amount was influential only when considered in conjunction with habitat quality covariates and only for two sensitive species to habitat loss (agouti and red brocket deer). Habitat quality alone was the best predictor of habitat use for two of the less sensitive species (white lipped peccary and collared peccary). Habitat use for two species was not explained by any covariate (tapir and gray brocket deer). Conclusions: Conservation programs should incorporate both habitat quality and amount when dealing with sensitive species and prioritize habitat quality management when focusing in less sensitive species.
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
La (falta de) perspectiva de género en la Ley 14449 de la provincia de Buenos Aires: Reinterpretación de los principios rectores y directrices generales de la Ley de Acceso Justo al Hábitat a partir de instrumentos del Sistema de Naciones Unidas
Aladro, Almendra Maribel (Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, 2020-12)Partiendo de la diferencia entre la lucha por la ciudad planteada por Henri Lefebvre y la disputa en el campo jurídico por el derecho a la ciudad, y de la distinción entre la agenda de lucha de las mujeres planteada por ... -
Fragmentación y disponibilidad de hábitat boscoso de especies nativas en un área Premium del Hotspot chileno
Echeverria, Cristian; UNIVERSIDAD DE CONCEPCION (2018)El conocimiento del estado de fragmentación y transformación de un paisaje boscoso es crucial para una adecuada planificación y conservación de la biodiversidad. En Chile se encuentra uno de los hotspot mundiales de ... -
El pensamiento complejo y la transdisciplina en el abordaje del hábitat: Reflexiones en torno a la experiencia del Seminario de Gestión Territorial y Hábitat
Vanoli, Fernando Nicolas (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño, 2017-12)Este artículo propone reflexionar respecto a la experiencia pedagógica del seminario de Gestión Territorial y Hábitat, de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Haciendo foco en las ...