Chronology of deposition and unconformity development across the Cretaceous Paleogene boundary, Magallanes-Austral Basin, Patagonian Andes

Abstract

The Magallanes-Austral foreland basin preserves an important record of orogenesis and landscape evolution in the Patagonian Andes of Chile and Argentina. Throughout the retroarc foreland basin, a regional disconformity with little to no angular discordance separates Upper Cretaceous-lower Paleocene strata from overlying deposits of diachronous Eocene to Miocene age. Here we report detrital zircon U-Pb geochronological results for 11 sandstone samples, and vitrinite reflectance data for 6 samples of organic matter from a fossiliferous dinosaur-bearing mixed nonmarine and marine clastic succession in the Rio de las Chinas valley (50-51 degrees S) of central-southern Patagonia to: (1) determine the timing and duration of the unconformity using U-Pb maximum depositional age constraints, (2) reconstruct sediment provenance and dispersal patterns, (3) assess possible temporal variations in arc magmatism, (4) evaluate the amount of sedimentary overburden removed during unconformity development, and (5) confirm the presence of a fossiliferous southern hemisphere Cretaceous-Paleogene (K/Pg) boundary site. Samples from the Dorotea Formation yield maximum depositional ages spanning Maastrichtian to Danian time (with ages as young as similar to 65-63 Ma), confirming preservation of the K/Pg boundary in a section with recently discovered fossils of dinosaurs, other terrestrial vertebrates, and plants. Samples from directly above the unconformity in the Man Aike Formation, yield middle Eocene maximum depositional ages (with a prominent 45-40 Ma age cluster), indicating a long-lived similar to 20 Myr hiatus representative of nondeposition or erosion. Analyses of organic matter preserved in multiple coal horizons of the uppermost Dorotea Formation show consistently low vitrinite reflectance values, requiring limited sedimentary burial, consistent with nondeposition or sediment bypass rather than deposition and later erosional removal of a previously proposed thick package of Paleocene to middle Eocene clastic material. On the basis of regional trends in the age and geometry of the unconformity, timing of arc magmatism, and temporal variations in sediment provenance, we consider a range of potential mechanisms for unconformity genesis, including (1) shortening-related uplift of the frontal fold-thrust belt, (2) cratonward advance of a flexural forebulge, (3) accommodation changes driven by regional or eustatic variations in sea level, (4) ridge collision and slab-window genesis, (5) isostatic rebound during tectonic quiescence (or minor extension), or (6) regional foreland uplift during flat-slab subduction.