info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Ibrutinib therapy downregulates AID enzyme and proliferative fractions in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Fecha
2019-05-13Registro en:
Morande, Pablo Elías; Sivina, Mariela; Uriepero, Angimar; Seija, Noé; Berca, Catalina; et al.; Ibrutinib therapy downregulates AID enzyme and proliferative fractions in chronic lymphocytic leukemia; American Society of Hematology; Blood; 133; 19; 13-5-2019; 2056-2068
0006-4971
CONICET Digital
CONICET
Autor
Morande, Pablo Elías
Sivina, Mariela
Uriepero, Angimar
Seija, Noé
Berca, Catalina
Fresia, Pablo
Landoni, Ana Inés
Di Noia, Javier M.
Burger, Jan A.
Oppezzo, Pablo
Resumen
Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination of the immunoglobulin genes. As a trade-off for its physiological function, AID also contributes to tumor development through its mutagenic activity. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), AID is overexpressed in the proliferative fractions (PFs) of the malignant B lymphocytes, and its anomalous expression has been associated with a clinical poor outcome. Recent preclinical data suggested that ibrutinib and idelalisib, 2 clinically approved kinase inhibitors, increase AID expression and genomic instability in normal and neoplastic B cells. These results raise concerns about a potential mutagenic risk in patients receiving long-term therapy. To corroborate these findings in the clinical setting, we analyzed AID expression and PFs in a CLL cohort before and during ibrutinib treatment. We found that ibrutinib decreases the CLL PFs and, interestingly, also reduces AID expression, which correlates with dampened AKT and Janus Kinase 1 signaling. Moreover, although ibrutinib increases AID expression in a CLL cell line, it is unable to do so in primary CLL samples. Our results uncover a differential response to ibrutinib between cell lines and the CLL clone and imply that ibrutinib could differ from idelalisib in their potential to induce AID in treated patients. Possible reasons for the discrepancy between preclinical and clinical findings, and their effect on treatment safety, are discussed.