Dissertação
Inovação em saúde: avaliação das iniciativas vencedoras do Prêmio de Incentivo em Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação para o SUS
Fecha
2020-03-24Autor
Medeiros, Amanda de Souza
Institución
Resumen
Innovations in the public sector result in more efficient and effective services, where problem
solving translates into beneficial results for society. The health sector is considered to be one
of the most innovative sectors. Thus, to encourage and reward innovators, in 2002, the Incentive
Award in Science, Technology and Innovation for SUS was created. From this, the objective
of the study is to characterize the innovations that won the Award, through a multiple case
study. Data collection took place in two moments, the first by documentary analysis of 63
awarded cases, so that the innovation approaches, typologies and results of these innovations
were classified. Secondly, through semi-structured interviews with 18 winning authors of the
contest, representing 19 initiatives - one author was awarded in two editions - in which the
inductors, barriers, facilitators, the results of these cases were identified, which were
implemented in the SUS and the challenges of innovation in the public sector. The data
underwent content analysis. As for the results, the Innovation of Improvement approach was
the most identified among the 63 cases, the types of Communication Innovation and Process
Innovation were the predominant ones. As for the inducers, the Problem Oriented and Non-
Problem Oriented factors were the main ones highlighted among the interviewees. Human
Resources (HR) Limitations and Budget and Financial Limitations were the main barriers
encountered. As for facilitators, Resource Availability and Teamwork prevailed. Regarding the
results of these award-winning innovations, Improvements in Organizational Management,
Improvement in Delivery and / or Quality of Services, Improvement of Image and Institutional
Relations and Improvement of Organizational Climate, were identified in that order of
predominance. The study found that only two initiatives were continued due to political,
legislative and budgetary issues. Also, that the public sector does not motivate and does not
encourage professionals to innovate, due to several challenges yet to be overcome.