Buscar

Mostrando ítems 1-10 de 38184

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp); Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (Oxford University Press, 2003-01-01)

We present a fast procedure for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis in which hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) solvent, instead of the critical point drying, is used to remove liquids from a microbiological specimen. The ...

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp); Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (Oxford University Press, 2003-01-01)

Sem terra, sem documento

Brandão, Antônio Salazar Pessoa (Centro de Agronegócio - Fundação Getulio Vargas, 1998)

SEM and HRTEM analysis of ZnS nanoflakes produced by a simple route

López Gayou, Valentín (2012-11-27)

In this work, we report the synthesis of ZnS nanostructures by a simple and eco-friendly method that makes possible producing nanoflakes at room temperature. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron ...

Characterization of materials through SEM measuresCaracterización de materiales a través de medidas de microscopía electrónica de barrido (SEM)

Clavijo, Josué (Politécnico Grancolombiano, 2013)

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Araujo, JC; Teran, FC; Oliveira, RA; Nour, EAA; Montenegro, MAP; Campos, JR; Vazoller, RF (Oxford Univ PressOxfordInglaterra, 2003)

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Araujo, J. C.; Teran, F. C.; Oliveira, R. A.; Nour, EAA; Montenegro, MAP; Campos, JR; Vazoller, R. F. (Oxford University Press, 2014)

1
2
3
4
. . .
3819

Buscar

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Sem terra, sem documento

SEM and HRTEM analysis of ZnS nanoflakes produced by a simple route

Characterization of materials through SEM measuresCaracterización de materiales a través de medidas de microscopía electrónica de barrido (SEM)

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Anodic porous alumina structural characteristics study based on SEM image processing and analysis

SEM-EDS and biomechanical evaluation of implants with different surface treatments: An initial study

SEM-EDS and biomechanical evaluation of implants with different surface treatments: An initial study

Buscar

Filtros

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Sem terra, sem documento

SEM and HRTEM analysis of ZnS nanoflakes produced by a simple route

Characterization of materials through SEM measuresCaracterización de materiales a través de medidas de microscopía electrónica de barrido (SEM)

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Comparison of hexamethyidisilazane and critical point drying treatments for SEM analysis of anaerobic biofilms and granular sludge

Anodic porous alumina structural characteristics study based on SEM image processing and analysis

SEM-EDS and biomechanical evaluation of implants with different surface treatments: An initial study

SEM-EDS and biomechanical evaluation of implants with different surface treatments: An initial study