Buscar

Mostrando ítems 1-10 de 5709

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews

Garritty, Chantelle; Gartlehner, Gerald; Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara; King, Valerie J.; Hamel, Candyce; Chris Kamel; L, Affengruber; Stevens, Adrienne

Objective: To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent ...

Choose your shortcuts wisely: COVID-19 rapid reviews of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine

Hunter, Jennifer; Arentz, Susan; Goldenberg, Joshua; Yang, Guoyan; Beardsley, Jennifer; Soo Lee, Myeong; Myers, Stephen P.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an explosion of rapid reviews geared towards providing timesensitive answers for clinical and policy decision-makers. Rapid reviews strike a balance between rigour and rapidity to minimise ...

Trading certainty for speed - How much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: An international survey

Wagner, Gernot; Nussbaumer Streit, Barbara; Greimel, Judith; Ciapponi, Agustín; Gartlehner, Gerald (BioMed Central, 2017-08)

Background: Decisionmakers and guideline developers demand rapid syntheses of the evidence when time sensitive evidence-informed decisions are required. A potential trade-off of such rapid reviews is that their results can ...

What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review

Haby, Michelle M.; Chapman, Evelina; Clark, Rachel; Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia; Reveiz, Ludovic; Lavis, John N. (Springer Nature, 2020)

Rapid response in health technology assessment: a delphi study for a Brazilian guideline

Silva, Marcus Tolentino; Silva, Everton Nunes da; Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia (Springer Nature, 2020)

Improvement in the Routine Screening of Cervical Smears A Study Using Rapid Prescreening and 100% Rapid Review as Internal Quality Control Methods

Tavares, SBN; de Sousa, NLA; Manrique, EJC; de Albuquerque, ZBP; Zeferino, LC; Amaral, RG (Wiley-blackwellMaldenEUA, 2011)

What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review

Haby, Michelle M.; Chapman, Evelina; Clark, Rachel; Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia; Reveiz, Ludovic; Lavis, John N. (Springer Nature, 2016)

Improvement In The Routine Screening Of Cervical Smears: A Study Using Rapid Prescreening And 100% Rapid Review As Internal Quality Control Methods

Tavares S.B.N.; Alves De Sousa N.L.; Manrique E.J.C.; Pinheiro De Albuquerque Z.B.; Zeferino L.C.; Amaral R.G. (, 2011)

Analysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens

Manrique, EJC; Souza, NLA; Tavares, SBN; Albuquerque, ZBP; Zeferino, LC; Amaral, RG (Wiley-blackwellMaldenEUA, 2011)

Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies

Haby, Michelle M.; Chapman, Evelina; Clark, Rachel; Barreto, Jorge Otávio Maia; Reveiz, Ludovic; Lavis, John N. (Springer Nature, 2020)

1
2
3
4
. . .
571

Buscar

Filtros

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews

Choose your shortcuts wisely: COVID-19 rapid reviews of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine

Trading certainty for speed - How much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: An international survey

What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review

Rapid response in health technology assessment: a delphi study for a Brazilian guideline

Improvement in the Routine Screening of Cervical Smears A Study Using Rapid Prescreening and 100% Rapid Review as Internal Quality Control Methods

What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review

Improvement In The Routine Screening Of Cervical Smears: A Study Using Rapid Prescreening And 100% Rapid Review As Internal Quality Control Methods

Analysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens

Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies