Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews
Autor
Garritty, Chantelle
Gartlehner, Gerald
Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
King, Valerie J.
Hamel, Candyce
Chris Kamel
L, Affengruber
Stevens, Adrienne
Institución
Resumen
Objective: To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs)
produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for
decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority.
Study Design: Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review of the underlying
evidence, primary methods studies conducted, and a survey sent to 119 representatives from 20
Cochrane entities, who were asked to rate and rank RR methods across stages of review conduct.
Discussions among those with expertise in RR methods further informed the list of
recommendations with accompanying rationales provided.
Results: Based on survey results from 63 respondents (53% response rate), 26 RR methods
recommendations are presented for which there was a high or moderate level of agreement or
scored highest in the absence of such agreement. Where possible, how recommendations align
with Cochrane methods guidance for SRs is highlighted.
Conclusion: The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers new, interim guidance to
support the conduct of RRs. Because best practice is limited by the lack of currently available
evidence for some RR methods shortcuts taken, this guidance will need to be updated as
additional abbreviated methods are evaluated.