dc.creatorRojas-Saffie, Juan Pablo
dc.creatorGarcía Matte, Nicolás Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-10T20:25:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-17T22:04:44Z
dc.date.available2024-06-10T20:25:57Z
dc.date.available2024-07-17T22:04:44Z
dc.date.created2024-06-10T20:25:57Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1419202
dc.identifier1664-1078
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1419202
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/86677
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9510168
dc.description.abstractThis article aims to thoroughly understand the concept of emotional self-regulation (ESR) and its relationship with personality. Through an interdisciplinary dialogue between psychology and philosophy—specifically, the anthropology of Thomas Aquinas—three realities are proposed that could be considered as ESR. The conceptual relationship between ESR—understood as operation, faculty and habit—and personality is examined, specifically using the Five-Factor Model and the virtues model. Key findings include the need for consensus on a precise definition of ESR, the central role of reason as a faculty capable of ruling over emotions, the relevance of the distinction between ESR and self-control, and the understanding of ESR as a set of habits that include aspects of prudence, temperance and fortitude. Interdisciplinary dialogue seems to be a valuable intellectual approach to the advancement of the field of psychology.
dc.languageen
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.subjectEmotions
dc.subjectAffectivity
dc.subjectSelf-regulation
dc.titleEmotional self-regulation and personality in the light of Thomas Aquinas’s philosophical anthropology
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución