La constitucionalización de la doble instancia en el contencioso administrativo chileno

dc.creatorMoya, Pedro Harris
dc.date2024-06-21T02:14:46Z
dc.date2024-06-21T02:14:46Z
dc.date2024
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-17T21:15:17Z
dc.date.available2024-07-17T21:15:17Z
dc.identifier10.22201/iij.24484881e.2024.50.18805
dc.identifier14059193
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/11490
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9509830
dc.descriptionRecently, the Chilean Constitutional Court sanctioned the unconstitutionality of administrative contentious processes without appeal proceedings, under an abstract and general control. Retrospectively, this judgment represents a shift in case law, which had only affirmed a principle of appeal in administrative contentious processes. Prospectively, this judgment is also a modification of an interpretative criterion capable of producing different effects relating to judicial review of administrative decisions. This article analyzes each aspect and investigates the basis of the declaration of unconstitutionality administrative contentious processes without appeal proceedings. Subsequently, different readings are proposed in relation to the constitutionality of administrative contentious processes without appeal proceedings. © 2024 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagees
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
dc.subjectadministrative acts
dc.subjectadministrative litigation
dc.subjectappeal procedure
dc.subjectconstitutional review
dc.titleThe Constitutionalization of the Appeal Proceedings in the Chilean Administrative Litigation
dc.titleLa constitucionalización de la doble instancia en el contencioso administrativo chileno
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución