El contencioso administrativo de multas sanitarias en el derecho chileno: ¿es compatible con el principio de proporcionalidad?**

dc.creatorHarris Moya, Pedro
dc.date2024-04-10T06:30:37Z
dc.date2024-04-10T06:30:37Z
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-17T21:09:45Z
dc.date.available2024-07-17T21:09:45Z
dc.identifier10.18601/01229893.n53.11
dc.identifier01229893
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12728/10998
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9508685
dc.descriptionIn Chilean administrative law, sanitary sanctions have become the subject of a special contentious action (article 171 of the Sanitary Code), whose interpretation has been restrictive. The courts can only annul (and not modify) administrative sanctions. Given the fines, this cancellation would only apply if the imposition of the sanctions exceeds the legal maximum. As is easy to see, this replaces the principle of proportionality with the principle of legality, which is aggravated by the wide margin of appreciation in its imposition. Despite this, a rereading of the applicable regulations makes it possible to question these conclusions, in order to apply the principle of proportionality. © 2022 Universidad Externado de Colombia. All rights reserved.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagees
dc.publisherUniversidad Externado de Colombia
dc.subjectfines
dc.subjectjudicial review
dc.subjectproportionality
dc.subjectSanitary sanctions
dc.titleThe Administrative Litigation of Sanitary Fines in Chilean Law: Is it Compatible with the Principle of Proportionality?
dc.titleEl contencioso administrativo de multas sanitarias en el derecho chileno: ¿es compatible con el principio de proporcionalidad?**
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución