dc.creatorYáñez, Marco A
dc.creatorEspinoza, Sergio
dc.creatorOvalle, Juan
dc.creatorMagni, Carlos
dc.creatorMartínez-Herrera, Eduardo
dc.date2024-01-23T18:29:18Z
dc.date2024-01-23T18:29:18Z
dc.date2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T20:32:08Z
dc.date.available2024-05-02T20:32:08Z
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/5209
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9275395
dc.descriptionThere is an increasing interest in using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve hybrid poplar performance under water stress conditions. We assessed the growth and leaf-level physiological responses of different hybrid poplar clones to the inoculation of a microbial consortium and subjected to moderate water shortage. In a nursery experiment, growth, leaf gas exchange, and biomass partitioning traits were assessed during one growing season on twenty hybrid clones from interspecific crosses of Populus trichocarpa × P.deltoides and (P. trichocarpa × P. deltoides) × P. deltoides, which were submitted to two treatments of PGPM inoculation (Inoculated, Inoc_1 vs. non-inoculated, Inoc_0) and two irrigation treatments (full water vs. water restriction). The water restriction decreased shoot growth, photosynthetic rate (Asat), and stomatal conductance (gs); increased intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEint) of the hybrid clones but it did not change the root-to-shoot ratio. Unlike our expectations, by the end of the study, treatment Inoc_1 slightly decreased basal diameter (D) and height (H) relative to Inoc_0 (5.8% and 5.2 %, respectively). Moreover, seven clones significantly decreased the root biomass by 37% to 62% in the Inoc_1 relative to Inoc_0 treatment, while the other clones showed no response to the inoculation. Oppositely, while most of the clones showed no response to the Inoc_1 treatment on leaf-physiological traits compared to Inoc_0, some of them exhibited an increase of Asat of 15% to 39%. Overall, the consortium applied did not improve the responses to the water restriction, and responses to the inoculation were more associated with a deleterious than a growth-promoting effect, which is discussed in the context of nutrient immobilization, application method, and timing.
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.sourceIForest, 16(6), 352-360
dc.subjectBiomass Partitioning
dc.subjectLeaf-physiological Traits
dc.subjectPGPM Inoculation
dc.subjectPoplar Clones
dc.subjectWater Stress
dc.titleVariations in the performance of hybrid poplars subjected to the inoculation of a microbial consortium and water restriction
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución