| dc.creator | Montoro, Maria | |
| dc.creator | Arrua-Duarte, Elsa | |
| dc.creator | Peñalver-Argüeso, Belén | |
| dc.creator | Migoya-Borja, Marta | |
| dc.creator | Baca-Garcia, Enrique | |
| dc.creator | Barrigón-Estévez, María L. | |
| dc.date | 2023-05-08T19:11:00Z | |
| dc.date | 2023-05-08T19:11:00Z | |
| dc.date | 2020 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-02T20:31:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-05-02T20:31:11Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/4752 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9274990 | |
| dc.description | The gold standard for measuring anhedonia is the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). To date, there are no validated electronic versions of this questionnaire. We aim to study the equivalence between the traditional paper-and-pencil format and a digital version of the SHAPS. A group of 67 patients completed both SHAPS formats, and differences between formats were assessed. McNemar’s test showed no significant differences between the two systems. The Kappa coefficient was over 40% for most items, and reliability was above 0.8, showing good to excellent levels of internal consistency. Thus, we have demonstrated a close equivalence between paper-and-pencil and electronic SHAPS. | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/ | |
| dc.source | Journal of Health Psychology, 27(3), 557-567 | |
| dc.subject | Anhedonia | |
| dc.subject | Depression | |
| dc.subject | Psychometrics | |
| dc.subject | SHAPS scale | |
| dc.subject | Telemedicine | |
| dc.title | Comparative study of paper-and-pencil and electronic formats of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale | |
| dc.type | Article | |
