dc.creatorCarmona-Camacho, Rodrigo
dc.creatorLê Cook, Benjamin
dc.creatorBaca-García, Enrique
dc.creatorChavez, Ligia
dc.creatorAlvarez, Kiara
dc.creatorIza, Miren
dc.creatorAlegría, M.
dc.date2023-03-14T18:20:12Z
dc.date2023-03-14T18:20:12Z
dc.date2019
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T20:30:31Z
dc.date.available2024-05-02T20:30:31Z
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.ucm.cl/handle/ucm/4501
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9274684
dc.descriptionAnalyses of healthcare expenditures and adequacy are needed to identify cost-effective policies and practices that improve mental healthcare quality. Data are from 2010 to 2012 electronic health records from three hospital psychiatry departments in Madrid (n = 29,944 person-years) and three in Boston (n = 14,109 person-years). Two-part multivariate generalized linear regression and logistic regression models were estimated to identify site differences in mental healthcare expenditures and quality of care. Annual total average treatment expenditures were $4442.14 in Boston and $2277.48 in Madrid. Boston patients used inpatient services more frequently and had higher 30-day re-admission rates (23.7 vs. 8.7%) despite higher rates of minimally adequate care (49.5 vs. 34.8%). Patients in Madrid were more likely to receive psychotropic medication, had fewer inpatient stays and readmissions, and had lower expenditures, but had lower rates of minimally adequate care. Differences in insurance and healthcare system policies and mental health professional roles may explain these dissimilarities.
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.sourceThe Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 46(3), 464-474
dc.titleComparison of mental health treatment adequacy and costs in public hospitals in Boston and Madrid
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución