dc.creatorCastillo Allendes, Adrián
dc.creatorDelgado Bravo, Mauricio Antonio
dc.creatorReyes Ponce, Alvaro
dc.creatorHunter, Eric J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T12:37:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T20:03:24Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T12:37:17Z
dc.date.available2024-05-02T20:03:24Z
dc.date.created2024-01-10T12:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.09.024
dc.identifier1873-34588
dc.identifier18734588 08921997
dc.identifierSCOPUS_ID:85140312455
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.09.024
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/76806
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9273437
dc.description.abstract© 2022 The Voice FoundationObjective: Body posture is a commonly discussed component of voice training and therapy. However, body postures, postural changes, related posturing muscle monitoring, and the potential changes in voice production (eg, glottal aerodynamic changes, acoustic differences) have been inconsistently described in the literature, leaving room for free interpretation and possible misunderstandings. The primary purpose of this pilot study was to compare the magnitude of electromyographical activation of muscles involved in phonation-breathing functions and their changes due to four standardized body postures in experienced singers. Secondly, to identify which body posture produces greater changes in aerodynamic parameters, vocal pitch, and loudness. Methods: Eight healthy adults with experience in singing voice performed a vocal task during different body postures commonly used in both voice training and therapy. A 3D-capture system was used to control and quantify the alignment of each posture. During the performances, surface electromyography (sEMG) was used to measure the muscular activity involved in the breathing/phonation and posture processes. A nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the sEMG activity of phonatory muscles and aerodynamic voice variables between postures. Results: Our study did not reveal significant differences in sEMG activity, aerodynamic parameters, vocal pitch, and loudness among body postures during vocal task productions. However, the vocal pitch (in semitones) revealed significant differences in the unstable surface when compared to the upright posture, modified upright, and leaning postures. Conclusion: The body postures selected did not generate voice aerodynamic modifications of the voice nor in the levels of activation of muscles involved in the phonation-breathing process in individuals with experience in singing voice. Modifications of body posture as a tool for voice therapy should be further investigated, considering the population with voice problems and no voice training experience.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relationJournal of Voice
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.titleMuscle Activity and Aerodynamic Voice Changes at Different Body Postures: A Pilot Study
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución