dc.creator | Cortinez, LI | |
dc.creator | Munoz, HR | |
dc.creator | De la Fuente, R | |
dc.creator | Acuna, D | |
dc.creator | Dagnino, JA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-10T13:43:42Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-02T19:24:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-10T13:43:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-02T19:24:25Z | |
dc.date.created | 2024-01-10T13:43:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1017/S0265021505000128 | |
dc.identifier | 1365-2346 | |
dc.identifier | 0265-0215 | |
dc.identifier | MEDLINE:15816575 | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265021505000128 | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/78731 | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000229535000012 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9272534 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background and objective: Target-controlled infusions (TCIs) of remifentanil and fentanyl in conscious sedation regimes for extra-corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy have not been reported. We estimated the effect site concentrations of remifentanil and fentanyl needed to obtain adequate analgesia in 50% of patients (EC50) and compared both drugs in terms of intra- and post-procedure complications. | |
dc.description.abstract | Methods: Forty-four adult patients were randomly distributed into two groups: Group R received remifentanil and Group F received fentanyl TCI with initial effect site concentrations of 1.5 and 2 ng mL(-1), respectively. Pain was assessed using a 10-point verbal analogue scale and <3 was considered adequate analgesia. Increments or decrements of 0.5 ng mL(-1) were then introduced for subsequent patients according to Dixon's up and down method. During the rest of the procedure, TO was adjusted to maintain verbal analogue scale <3. | |
dc.description.abstract | Results: Remifentanil and fentanyl EC50 were 2.8 ng mL(-1) (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.8-3.7 ng mL(-1)) and 2.9 ng mL(-1) (95 % Cl: 1.7-4.1 ng mL(-1)), respectively (n.s.). At EC50, the probability of having a respiratory rate <10 was 4% MIX Cl: 0-57%) for remifentanil and 56%, (95% Cl: 13-92%) for fentanyl. Hypoxaemia, vomiting and sedation were more frequent in Group F during and after the procedure (P < 0.05). | |
dc.description.abstract | Conclusions: A similar EC50 but more respiratory depression, sedation and PONV were found with fentanyl TO than with remifentanil TCI. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS | |
dc.rights | acceso restringido | |
dc.subject | pharmacology, fentanyl, remifentanil, target-controlled infusion | |
dc.subject | respiratory depression | |
dc.subject | surgical procedures, extra-corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy | |
dc.subject | COMPUTER-CONTROLLED INFUSION | |
dc.subject | MONITORED ANESTHESIA CARE | |
dc.subject | ALVEOLAR CONCENTRATION | |
dc.subject | PHARMACOKINETICS | |
dc.subject | ALFENTANIL | |
dc.subject | REDUCTION | |
dc.subject | DRUG | |
dc.subject | PUMP | |
dc.title | Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil or fentanyl during extra-corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy | |
dc.type | artículo | |