dc.creatorCortinez, LI
dc.creatorMunoz, HR
dc.creatorDe la Fuente, R
dc.creatorAcuna, D
dc.creatorDagnino, JA
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T13:43:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T19:24:25Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T13:43:42Z
dc.date.available2024-05-02T19:24:25Z
dc.date.created2024-01-10T13:43:42Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier10.1017/S0265021505000128
dc.identifier1365-2346
dc.identifier0265-0215
dc.identifierMEDLINE:15816575
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0265021505000128
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/78731
dc.identifierWOS:000229535000012
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9272534
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: Target-controlled infusions (TCIs) of remifentanil and fentanyl in conscious sedation regimes for extra-corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy have not been reported. We estimated the effect site concentrations of remifentanil and fentanyl needed to obtain adequate analgesia in 50% of patients (EC50) and compared both drugs in terms of intra- and post-procedure complications.
dc.description.abstractMethods: Forty-four adult patients were randomly distributed into two groups: Group R received remifentanil and Group F received fentanyl TCI with initial effect site concentrations of 1.5 and 2 ng mL(-1), respectively. Pain was assessed using a 10-point verbal analogue scale and <3 was considered adequate analgesia. Increments or decrements of 0.5 ng mL(-1) were then introduced for subsequent patients according to Dixon's up and down method. During the rest of the procedure, TO was adjusted to maintain verbal analogue scale <3.
dc.description.abstractResults: Remifentanil and fentanyl EC50 were 2.8 ng mL(-1) (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.8-3.7 ng mL(-1)) and 2.9 ng mL(-1) (95 % Cl: 1.7-4.1 ng mL(-1)), respectively (n.s.). At EC50, the probability of having a respiratory rate <10 was 4% MIX Cl: 0-57%) for remifentanil and 56%, (95% Cl: 13-92%) for fentanyl. Hypoxaemia, vomiting and sedation were more frequent in Group F during and after the procedure (P < 0.05).
dc.description.abstractConclusions: A similar EC50 but more respiratory depression, sedation and PONV were found with fentanyl TO than with remifentanil TCI.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectpharmacology, fentanyl, remifentanil, target-controlled infusion
dc.subjectrespiratory depression
dc.subjectsurgical procedures, extra-corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy
dc.subjectCOMPUTER-CONTROLLED INFUSION
dc.subjectMONITORED ANESTHESIA CARE
dc.subjectALVEOLAR CONCENTRATION
dc.subjectPHARMACOKINETICS
dc.subjectALFENTANIL
dc.subjectREDUCTION
dc.subjectDRUG
dc.subjectPUMP
dc.titleTarget-controlled infusion of remifentanil or fentanyl during extra-corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución