dc.creatorDonoso, Alfonso
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T13:10:02Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T13:10:02Z
dc.date.created2024-01-10T13:10:02Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier1665-2037
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/77750
dc.identifierWOS:000425180500004
dc.description.abstractAre laws that forbid the entrance of foreigners in a state on grounds of their criminal record morally justifiable? Taking as a starting point Cecile Fabre's arguments (2016) against Joseph Caren's use of these laws or criteria of inadmissibility (2013), I consider a series of plausible arguments against these criteria to ultimately reject each of them. Instead, I offer a different and substantive normative critique against this criterion of penal inadmissibility based on the principle of equality, pivotal to any plausible political theory and, thus, central to an adequate conception of punishment within the political community. Ultimately, I deem penal inadmissibility unjustifiable within a political community that aspires to respect each individual's equal moral status.
dc.languagees
dc.publisherCENTRO DE INVESTIGACION Y DOCENCIA ECONOMICAS
dc.rightsregistro bibliográfico
dc.subjectpunishment
dc.subjectethics of immigration
dc.subjectlaws of inadmissibility
dc.subjectETHICS
dc.titleImmigration and Punishment: Against the Laws of Penal Inadmissibility
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución