dc.creatorCornejo, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T13:12:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T17:52:24Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T13:12:01Z
dc.date.available2024-05-02T17:52:24Z
dc.date.created2024-01-10T13:12:01Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier10.1177/1354067X11427470
dc.identifier1354-067X
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X11427470
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/78129
dc.identifierWOS:000301887200008
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9269217
dc.description.abstractMatusov (2011) sustains that Vygotsky and Bakhtin represent irreconcilable theoretical approaches. In his view, Vygotsky's model is monologic and universalist, while Bakhtin's is dialogic and pluralist. Although the two authors differ importantly, one cannot speak of irreconcilability for two main reasons. First, Vygotsky's approach is much more multifaceted and even contradictory than usually thought. In fact, his concept of sense echoes the Romanticist claim that experience exceeds the limits of language. Second, a dialogical conception of mind is not outside the reach of Hegelian tradition, which, in Matusov interpretation, is where Vygotsky's approach comes from. I emphasize that Bakhtin's unit of analysis is the voice-a concept more sociologic than psychological. "Voice" is insensitive to selfhood and should not be taken as synonymous of "person." Notwithstanding, Vygotsky and Bakhtin share beliefs with respect to the social constitution of the mind that allow including them in the same research program.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.rightsregistro bibliográfico
dc.subjectBakhtin
dc.subjectRomanticism
dc.subjectsense
dc.subjectsociogenesis
dc.subjectvoice
dc.subjectVygotsky
dc.subjectWORDS
dc.titleContrasting Vygotsky's and Bakhtin's approaches to consciousness
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución