dc.creatorRaineri, R
dc.creatorGiaconi, P
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T12:41:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T17:47:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T12:41:46Z
dc.date.available2024-05-02T17:47:29Z
dc.date.created2024-01-10T12:41:46Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier10.1016/j.eneco.2005.04.001
dc.identifier0140-9883
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2005.04.001
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/77448
dc.identifierWOS:000232047900005
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9269008
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents and analyzes a model of electricity distribution in Chile with three alternative regulatory pricing contract schemes for assigning a common capacity cost to final customers and competitive energy sellers. The first scheme involves Ramsey Pricing, while under the second and third schemes the monopoly chooses final prices and access charges subject either to a peak-load Physical Cap or a total revenue Price Cap constraint. In addition, we consider circumstances in which the regulator does not know consumer demand, the monopoly cannot price discriminate beyond a range defined by the marginal cost as a floor and the stand-alone cost as a ceiling, and access charges are set at the fully distributed cost allocation level currently in force. The model is calibrated with Chilean data, and demonstrates that in terms of social welfare the fully distributed cost contract scheme currently in effect can be improved by discriminatory pricing complemented by certain of the analyzed constraints. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectaccess pricing
dc.subjectprice discrimination
dc.subjectelectric distribution
dc.subjectutilities
dc.subjectCOMPETITION
dc.titlePrice and access charge discrimination in electricity distribution: An application to the Chilean case
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución