dc.creatorFermandois Vohringer, Arturo
dc.creatorChubretovic Arnaiz, Teresita
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T13:47:09Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T13:47:09Z
dc.date.created2024-01-10T13:47:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier0718-3437
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/79241
dc.identifierWOS:000376951500004
dc.description.abstractIn the absence of a clear doctrine and insufficiency of legal precedents, this work proposes four precise criteria to solve and harmonize the procedural coexistence of the Concrete Writ of Constitutionality before the Court of Appeals and the actions sustained before de Environmental Courts. The proposal arises from the analysis of the nature and development of the constitutional action of article 20 of the Carta Magna, in combination with some standards already provided by the Supreme Court in its pronouncements.
dc.languagees
dc.publisherPONTIFICA UNIV CATOLICA DE CHILE FACULTAD DE DERECHO
dc.rightsregistro bibliográfico
dc.subjectConstitutional Law
dc.subjectadmissibility of concrete writ of constitutionality
dc.subjectenvironmental courts
dc.subjectjudicial review
dc.titleCONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS IN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: A PROPOSAL FOR NEW STANDARDS AFTER THE ARRIVAL OF SPECIALIZED AGENCIES AND COURTS (2010-2015)
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución