Colombia | Artículo de revista

Dynamic analysis and comparison of control techniques in the process of obtaining bioethanol

Análisis dinámico y comparación de técnicas de control en el proceso de obtención de bioetanol

dc.creatorMuñoz Ñungo, Oneida
dc.creatorAldemar Muñoz, José
dc.creatorHernández Sarabia, Héctor Mauricio
dc.date2023-04-11T15:56:30Z
dc.date2023-04-11T15:56:30Z
dc.date2022
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T19:23:29Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T19:23:29Z
dc.identifierC. Riaño Jaimes, J. Diaz Rodríguez & D. Mejía Bugallo, “On-line method for optimal tuning of PID controllers using standard OPC interface”, INGECUC, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 27–38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17981/ingecuc.18.2.2022.03
dc.identifier2382-4700
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9983
dc.identifier10.17981/ingecuc.18.2.2022.03
dc.identifier0122-6517
dc.identifierCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifierREDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/9169854
dc.descriptionIntroduction— Previous reactor models have been used to study the dynamic behavior of bioethanol production systems, however, few have elaborated a comparative study of control strategies that stabilize and control the variables of interest. Objective— The objective of this study is to analyze the stability of a fermentation system to obtain bioethanol, its dynamic behavior, the characterization of equilibrium points and bifurcation points of the mathematical model proposed by Jarzebski in 1992 for a continuous fermentation, taking into account the performance of the reaction in a bioreactor and the application of industrial control techniques for its optimization. Methodology— Review and design methods of quantitative and systematized type were used. Results— The comparison between two control strategies to control bioethanol production, PID control and Fuzzy. Conclusions— This work shows the importance of the stability analysis of a continuous system and how it can define the regions of operational interest, in this case for ethanol production, showing that productivity is inversely proportional to the dilution rate. Finally, it is concluded that a better dynamic behavior of the system is obtained when a Fuzzy controller is used. This work also shows the importance of the stability analysis of a continuous system and how it can define the regions of operational interest, in this case for the production of ethanol.
dc.descriptionIntroducción— Modelos de reactores anteriores han sido utilizados para estudiar el comportamiento dinámico de sistemas de producción de bioetanol, sin embargo, pocos han elaborado un estudio comparativo de estrategias de control que estabilicen y controlen las variables de interés. Objetivo— El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar la estabilidad de un sistema de fermentación para obtención de bioetanol, su comportamiento dinámico, la caracterización de puntos de equilibrio y puntos de bifurcación del modelo matemático planteado por Jarzebski en 1992 para una fermentación continua, teniendo en cuenta el rendimiento de la reacción en un biorreactor y la aplicación de técnicas de control industrial para su optimización. Metodología— Se utilizaron métodos de revisión y diseño de tipo cuantitativo y sistematizado. Resultados— Se presenta la comparación entre dos estrategias de control para controlar la producción de bioetanol, el control PID y el control Fuzzy. Se observó un mejor comportamiento dinámico cuando se utilizó el controlador Fuzzy. Conclusiones— Este trabajo muestra la importancia del análisis de estabilidad de un sistema en continuo y cómo éste puede definir las regiones de interés operativo, en este caso para la producción de etanol, mostrando que la productividad es inversamente proporcional a la tasa de dilución. Finalmente, se concluye que se tiene un mejor comportamiento dinámico del sistema cuando se utiliza un controlador Fuzzy.
dc.format12 páginas
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.publisherColombia
dc.relationINGE CUC
dc.relation[1] A. Jarzębski, “Modelling of oscillatory behaviour in continuous ethanol fermentation,” Biotechnol. Lett., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 137–142, Feb. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026241
dc.relation[2] J. Sadhukhan, E. Martinez-Hernandez, M. Amezcua-Allieri, J. Aburto & J. Honorato, “Economic and environmental impact evaluation of various biomass feedstock for bioethanol production and correlations to lignocellulosic composition,” Bioresour. Technol. Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Sep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100230
dc.relation[3] B. Šantek, G. Gwehenberger, M. I. Šantek, M. Narodoslawsky & P. Horvat, “Evaluation of energy demand and the sustainability of different bioethanol production processes from sugar beet,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 872–877, Sep. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.01.006
dc.relation[4] P. Iodice, G. Langella & A. Amoresano, “Ethanol in gasoline fuel blends: Effect on fuel consumption and engine out emissions of SI engines in cold operating conditions,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 130, pp. 1081–1089, Feb. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.11.090
dc.relation[5] J. Mantilla, D. Garzon & C. Galeano, “Análisis multivariable del desempeño y las emisiones en motores de combustión interna que utilizan mezclas de gasolina y etanol,” Ing. Energética, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 232–242, Sep. 2015. Available: https://rie.cujae.edu.cu/index.php/RIE/article/view/451
dc.relation[6] República de Colombia. Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Resolución No. 40785 de 8 de julio de 2013, por la cual se concede un registro. Disponible en http://visordocs.sic.gov.co/documentos/ Docs029/ActosEnLinea001/R-40785-2013.PDF?72
dc.relation[7] A. Yousefi-Darani, O. Paquet-Durand & B. Hitzmann, “Application of fuzzy logic control for the dough proofing process,” Food Bioprod. Process., vol. 115, pp. 36–46, May. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. fbp.2019.02.006
dc.relation[8] I. Edeh, “Bioethanol Production: An Overview,” in F. L. Inambao, Ed., Bioethanol Technologies, LDN, UK: IntechOpen, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.94895
dc.relation[9] D. Bernier-Oviedo, J. Rincón-Moreno, J. Solanilla, J. Muñoz & H. Váquiro, “Comparison of two pretreatments methods to produce second-generation bioethanol resulting from sugarcane bagasse,” Ind. Crops Prod., vol. 122, pp. 414–421, Oct. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.012
dc.relation[10] M. Toor, S. Kumar, S. Malyan, N. Bishnoi, T. Mathmani, K. Rajedran & A. Pugazhendhi, “An overview on bioethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks,” Chemosphere, vol. 242, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125080
dc.relation[11] D. Maurya, A. Singla & S. Negi, “An overview of key pretreatment processes for biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol,” 3 Biotech, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 597–609, Feb. 2015. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13205-015-0279-4
dc.relation[12] N. Pachauri, A. Rani & V. Singh, “Bioreactor temperature control using modified fractional order IMC-PID for ethanol production,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 122, pp. 97–112, Jun. 2017. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.03.031
dc.relation[13] A. Ciesielski, & R. Grzywacz, “Dynamic bifurcations in continuous process of bioethanol production under aerobic conditions using Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Biochem. Eng. J., vol. 161, pp. 1–10, Sep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2020.107609
dc.relation[14] I. Pataro, M. da Costa, & B. Joseph, “Closed-loop dynamic real-time optimization (CL-DRTO) of a bioethanol distillation process using an advanced multilayer control architecture,” Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 143, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107075
dc.relation[15] E. Imamoglu & F. Sukan, “Scale-up and kinetic modeling for bioethanol production,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 144, pp. 311–320, Sep. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.118
dc.relation[16] S. Fan, S, Chen, X. Tang, Z. Xiao, Q. Deng, P. Yao, Z. Sun, Y. Zhang & C. Chen, “Kinetic model of continuous ethanol fermentation in closed-circulating process with pervaporation membrane bioreactor by Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 177, pp. 169–175, Feb. 2015. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.076
dc.relation[17] M. Muslim, T. Sukma Yudha & B. Ibrahim, “Feedback-feedforward fuzzy logic approach for temperature control in bioethanol vacuum distiller,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 678–684, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v16.i2.pp678-684
dc.relation[18] F. Wang & H. Lin, “Fuzzy optimization of continuous fermentations with cell recycling for ethanol production,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 2306–2311, Jan. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/ ie901066a
dc.relation[19] J. Gomes, J. Batra, V. Chopda, P. Kathiresan & A. Rathore, “Monitoring and control of bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass,” in T. Bhaskar, A. Pandey, S. V. Mohan, D.-J. Lee, S. K. Khanal, eds., Waste Biorefinery: Potential and Perspectives, ch. 25, A-M-S, NL: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 727–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63992-9.00025-2
dc.relation[20] E. Petre, D. Selişteanu, & M. Roman, “Advanced nonlinear control strategies for a fermentation bioreactor used for ethanol production,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 328, pp. 1–10, May. 2021. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124836
dc.relation[21] A. Daugulis, P. McLellan & J. Li, “Experimental investigation and modeling of oscillatory behavior in the continuous culture ofZymomonas mobilis,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 99–105, Oct. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19971005)56:1<99::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-5
dc.relation[22] M. Henson, “Dynamic modeling of microbial cell populations,” COBIOT, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 460–467, Oct. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00104-6
dc.relation[23] F. Lei, M. Rotboll & S. Jorgensen, “A biochemically structured model for Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” J. Biotechnol., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 205–221, Jul. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00269-3
dc.relation[24] C. Strässle, B. Sonnleitner & A. Fiechter, “A predictive model for the spontaneous synchronization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in continuous culture. II. Experimental verification,” J. Biotechnol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 191–208, Feb. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(89)90108-9
dc.relation[25] I. Jöbses, G. Egberts, A. van Baalen & J. Roels, “Mathematical modelling of growth and substrate conversion of Zymomonas mobilis at 30 and 35°C,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 984–995, Jul. 1985. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260270709
dc.relation[26] P. Garhyan & S. Elnashaie, “Bifurcation analysis of two continuous membrane fermentor configurations for producing ethanol,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 59, no. 15, pp. 3235–3268, Aug. 2004. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.05.003
dc.relation[27] I. Jöbses, G. Egberts, K. Luyben & J. Roels, “Fermentation kinetics ofZymomonas mobilis at high ethanol concentrations: Oscillations in continuous cultures,” Biotechnol. Bioeng., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 868–877, Jun. 1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260280614
dc.relation[28] A. Namjoshi & D. Ramkrishna, “Multiplicity and stability of steady states in continuous bioreactors: Dissection of cybernetic models,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 56, no. 19, pp. 5593–5607, Oct. 2001. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00166-X
dc.relation[29] Y. Zhang, A. Zamamiri, M. Henson & M. Hjortsø, “Cell population models for bifurcation analysis and nonlinear control of continuous yeast bioreactors,” J. Process Control, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 721–734, Sep. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-1524(01)00010-5
dc.relation[30] G. Abdelghani, “Continuous Ethanol Fermentation at Very High Gravity in the Presence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Bifurcation Analysis”, J. Sustain. Bioenergy Syst., vol. 8, pp. 116–126, Dec. 2018. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2018.84009
dc.relation38
dc.relation27
dc.relation2
dc.relation18
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 INGE CUC
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.sourcehttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/ingecuc/article/view/3555
dc.subjectAlcoholic fermentation
dc.subjectPID control
dc.subjectFuzzy control
dc.subjectNon-linear systems
dc.subjectStability
dc.subjectFermentación alcohólica
dc.subjectControl PID
dc.subjectControl Fuzzy
dc.subjectSistemas no lineales
dc.subjectEstabilidad
dc.titleDynamic analysis and comparison of control techniques in the process of obtaining bioethanol
dc.titleAnálisis dinámico y comparación de técnicas de control en el proceso de obtención de bioetanol
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución