Bond strength of adhesive systems with different solvents to dry and wet dentin

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.creatorda Silva, Melissa Aline
dc.creatorRangel, Patrícia Maria
dc.creatorBarcellos, Daphne Câmara
dc.creatorPagani, Clovis
dc.creatorTorres, Carlos Rocha Gomes
dc.date2014-05-27T11:27:32Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:41:40Z
dc.date2014-05-27T11:27:32Z
dc.date2016-10-25T18:41:40Z
dc.date2013-01-01
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T02:08:24Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T02:08:24Z
dc.identifierJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice, v. 14, n. 1, p. 9-13, 2013.
dc.identifier1526-3711
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74303
dc.identifierhttp://acervodigital.unesp.br/handle/11449/74303
dc.identifier10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1261
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84876835758.pdf
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84876835758
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1261
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/895071
dc.descriptionAim: This study evaluates bond strength between dentin and composite using adhesives with different solvents to dry and wet dentin. Materials and methods: Ninety bovine incisors were used; the vestibular surfaces were worn by the exposure of an area with a diameter of 4 mm of dentin. The specimens were divided into 6 groups, according to the type of adhesive used and hydratation stals: Group SB-wet: Single Bond 2 in wet dentin, Group SBdry: Single Bond 2 in dry dentin, Group SL-wet: Solobond M in wet dentin, Group SL-dry: Solobond M in dentin dry. Group XPwet: XP Bond in wet dentin, Group XP-dry: XP Bond in dentin dry. They were cut to obtain specimens in the shape of stick with 1 × 1 mm and subjected to microtensile test in universal testing machine with a cross speed of 1mm/min. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's tests (5%). Results: ANOVA showed significant differences for surface treatment and interaction, but no difference was found for adhesive factor. The Tukey's test showed that the samples with wet dentin shown higher values of bond strength. Conclusion: The adhesive did not influence in the bond strength. The groups with wet dentin showed higher values of bond strength than groups with dry dentin.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAdhesive systems
dc.subjectBond strength
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectAdper single bond 2
dc.subjectdental material
dc.subjectdentin bonding agent
dc.subjectfiltek Z350
dc.subjectphosphoric acid
dc.subjectresin
dc.subjectSolobond M
dc.subjectsolvent
dc.subjecttooth cement
dc.subjectwater
dc.subjectXP Bond
dc.subjectXP-Bond
dc.subjectadhesion
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectdental acid etching
dc.subjectdental bonding
dc.subjectdental curing light
dc.subjectdental procedure
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjectdesiccation
dc.subjectequipment
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmechanical stress
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectpolymerization
dc.subjectrandomization
dc.subjecttemperature
dc.subjecttime
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental
dc.subjectAdhesiveness
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectCattle
dc.subjectComposite Resins
dc.subjectCuring Lights, Dental
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDental Cements
dc.subjectDental Materials
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents
dc.subjectDesiccation
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectPhosphoric Acids
dc.subjectPolymerization
dc.subjectRandom Allocation
dc.subjectSmear Layer
dc.subjectSolvents
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical
dc.subjectTemperature
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectWater
dc.titleBond strength of adhesive systems with different solvents to dry and wet dentin
dc.typeOtro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución