Plotinus and the third man argument

Plotinus and the third man argument;
Plotinus and the third man argument;
Plotin et l’argument du troisième homme;
Plotinus and the third man argument;
Plotino e o argumento do terceiro homem

dc.creatorPitteloud, Luca
dc.date2020-04-15
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T19:49:03Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T19:49:03Z
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43334
dc.identifier10.5902/2179378643334
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8942227
dc.descriptionThis paper proposes to pose the question of a possible position of Plotinus with regard to the Argument of the Third Man (TMA): first, we will examine if it is possible to attribute to Plotinus a position as regards TMA such as it appears in the Parmenides, in particular with regard to the premise which affirms the self-predication (SP) of the Forms. Next, we will briefly consider how the question of the soul-body relationship can, to some extent, provide a better understanding of why Plotinus does not bother to give an explicit objection to TMA. Finally, we will analyze how the theory of two kinds of resemblance strikes a fatal blow to the spirit of TMA.de-DE
dc.descriptionThis paper proposes to pose the question of a possible position of Plotinus with regard to the Argument of the Third Man (TMA): first, we will examine if it is possible to attribute to Plotinus a position as regards TMA such as it appears in the Parmenides, in particular with regard to the premise which affirms the self-predication (SP) of the Forms. Next, we will briefly consider how the question of the soul-body relationship can, to some extent, provide a better understanding of why Plotinus does not bother to give an explicit objection to TMA. Finally, we will analyze how the theory of two kinds of resemblance strikes a fatal blow to the spirit of TMA.en-US
dc.descriptionThis paper proposes to pose the question of a possible position of Plotinus with regard to the Argument of the Third Man (TMA): first, we will examine if it is possible to attribute to Plotinus a position as regards TMA such as it appears in the Parmenides, in particular with regard to the premise which affirms the self-predication (SP) of the Forms. Next, we will briefly consider how the question of the soul-body relationship can, to some extent, provide a better understanding of why Plotinus does not bother to give an explicit objection to TMA. Finally, we will analyze how the theory of two kinds of resemblance strikes a fatal blow to the spirit of TMA.es-ES
dc.descriptionCet article se propose de poser la question d’une éventuelle position de Plotin à propos de l’Argument du Troisième Homme (TMA): d’abord, nous examinerons s’il est possible d’attribuer à Plotin une position quant au TMA tel qu’il apparaît dans le Parménide, en particulier en ce qui concerne la prémisse qui affirme l’auto-prédication (self-predication - SP) des Formes. Ensuite, nous envisagerons brièvement comment la question du rapport de l’âme au corps, peut, dans une certaine mesure, permettre de mieux comprendre pourquoi Plotin ne prend pas la peine de fournir une objection explicite au TMA. Finalement, nous analyserons comment la théorie des deux sortes de ressemblance assène un coup fatal à l’esprit du TMA.fr-FR
dc.descriptionThis paper proposes to pose the question of a possible position of Plotinus with regard to the Argument of the Third Man (TMA): first, we will examine if it is possible to attribute to Plotinus a position as regards TMA such as it appears in the Parmenides, in particular with regard to the premise which affirms the self-predication (SP) of the Forms. Next, we will briefly consider how the question of the soul-body relationship can, to some extent, provide a better understanding of why Plotinus does not bother to give an explicit objection to TMA. Finally, we will analyze how the theory of two kinds of resemblance strikes a fatal blow to the spirit of TMA.it-IT
dc.descriptionThis paper proposes to pose the question of a possible position of Plotinus with regard to the Argument of the Third Man (TMA): first, we will examine if it is possible to attribute to Plotinus a position as regards TMA such as it appears in the Parmenides, in particular with regard to the premise which affirms the self-predication (SP) of the Forms. Next, we will briefly consider how the question of the soul-body relationship can, to some extent, provide a better understanding of why Plotinus does not bother to give an explicit objection to TMA. Finally, we will analyze how the theory of two kinds of resemblance strikes a fatal blow to the spirit of TMA.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.languagefra
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Mariapt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43334/pdf
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43334/html
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2020 Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofiapt-BR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Bd. 11 Nr. 1 (2020): Dossier Der "Parmenides" Platons + Schopenhauer-Studien; 118 - 133de-DE
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Dossier Plato's "Parmenides" + Schopenhauerian Studies; 118 - 133en-US
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Dossier El "Parménides" de Platon + Estudios Schopenhauerianos; 118 - 133es-ES
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 No 1 (2020): Dossiê O "Parmênides" de Platão + Estudos Schopenhauerianos; 118 - 133fr-FR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; V. 11 N. 1 (2020): Dossier Il "Parmenide" di Platone + Studi Schopenhaueriani; 118 - 133it-IT
dc.sourceVoluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 1 (2020): Dossiê O "Parmênides" de Platão + Estudos Schopenhauerianos; 118 - 133pt-BR
dc.source2179-3786
dc.subjectPlotinusde-DE
dc.subjectThird Mande-DE
dc.subjectMetaphysicsde-DE
dc.subjectIntelligible Formsde-DE
dc.subjectPlotinusen-US
dc.subjectThird Manen-US
dc.subjectMetaphysicsen-US
dc.subjectIntelligible Formsen-US
dc.subjectPlotinuses-ES
dc.subjectThird Manes-ES
dc.subjectMetaphysicses-ES
dc.subjectIntelligible Formses-ES
dc.subjectPlotinfr-FR
dc.subjectTroisième Hommefr-FR
dc.subjectMétaphysiquefr-FR
dc.subjectFormes intelligiblesfr-FR
dc.subjectPlotinusit-IT
dc.subjectThird Manit-IT
dc.subjectMetaphysicsit-IT
dc.subjectIntelligible Formsit-IT
dc.subjectPlotinuspt-BR
dc.subjectThird Manpt-BR
dc.subjectMetaphysicspt-BR
dc.subjectIntelligible Formspt-BR
dc.titlePlotinus and the third man argumentde-DE
dc.titlePlotinus and the third man argumenten-US
dc.titlePlotinus and the third man argumentes-ES
dc.titlePlotin et l’argument du troisième hommefr-FR
dc.titlePlotinus and the third man argumentit-IT
dc.titlePlotino e o argumento do terceiro homempt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución