The “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialogue

The “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialogue;
The “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialogue;
The “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialogue;
The “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialogue;
O "Parménides" como diálogo aporético

dc.creatorSantos, José Gabriel Trindade
dc.date2020-04-15
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T19:49:00Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T19:49:00Z
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43307
dc.identifier10.5902/2179378643307
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8942220
dc.descriptionThis text aims at illuminating some of the roles played by the notion of “aporia” in Plato’s Parmenides. Having described some of its uses in Plato’s dialogues, it concentrates on the Parmenides, analyzing: 1. Socrates’ debate with Zeno; 2. The set of objections presented by Parmenides to Socrates’ use of “separation” and “participation”, focusing on the “Third Man Argument”; 3. Some paradoxical conclusions resulting from the eight “Hypotheses on the One”, in the second part of the dialogue. Our objective is to sustain the unity of the work arguing in favor of using “the results attained in its II part to solve the problems presented in the I”. Parmenides” exercise on the One and the Others proposes a reformulation of dialectics. It denounces the deficiency in Zeno’s practice of reducing to absurdity the consequences of the hypothesis “if there are many”. Instead it examines the consequences of “If there is One” relating the One to itself and to each of the Others; then the Others in relation to themselves and to whatever other thing, first asserting the hypothesis and then denying it.  de-DE
dc.descriptionThis text aims at illuminating some of the roles played by the notion of “aporia” in Plato’s Parmenides. Having described some of its uses in Plato’s dialogues, it concentrates on the Parmenides, analyzing: 1. Socrates’ debate with Zeno; 2. The set of objections presented by Parmenides to Socrates’ use of “separation” and “participation”, focusing on the “Third Man Argument”; 3. Some paradoxical conclusions resulting from the eight “Hypotheses on the One”, in the second part of the dialogue. Our objective is to sustain the unity of the work arguing in favor of using “the results attained in its II part to solve the problems presented in the I”. Parmenides” exercise on the One and the Others proposes a reformulation of dialectics. It denounces the deficiency in Zeno’s practice of reducing to absurdity the consequences of the hypothesis “if there are many”. Instead it examines the consequences of “If there is One” relating the One to itself and to each of the Others; then the Others in relation to themselves and to whatever other thing, first asserting the hypothesis and then denying it.en-US
dc.descriptionThis text aims at illuminating some of the roles played by the notion of “aporia” in Plato’s Parmenides. Having described some of its uses in Plato’s dialogues, it concentrates on the Parmenides, analyzing: 1. Socrates’ debate with Zeno; 2. The set of objections presented by Parmenides to Socrates’ use of “separation” and “participation”, focusing on the “Third Man Argument”; 3. Some paradoxical conclusions resulting from the eight “Hypotheses on the One”, in the second part of the dialogue. Our objective is to sustain the unity of the work arguing in favor of using “the results attained in its II part to solve the problems presented in the I”. Parmenides” exercise on the One and the Others proposes a reformulation of dialectics. It denounces the deficiency in Zeno’s practice of reducing to absurdity the consequences of the hypothesis “if there are many”. Instead it examines the consequences of “If there is One” relating the One to itself and to each of the Others; then the Others in relation to themselves and to whatever other thing, first asserting the hypothesis and then denying it. es-ES
dc.descriptionThis text aims at illuminating some of the roles played by the notion of “aporia” in Plato’s Parmenides. Having described some of its uses in Plato’s dialogues, it concentrates on the Parmenides, analyzing: 1. Socrates’ debate with Zeno; 2. The set of objections presented by Parmenides to Socrates’ use of “separation” and “participation”, focusing on the “Third Man Argument”; 3. Some paradoxical conclusions resulting from the eight “Hypotheses on the One”, in the second part of the dialogue. Our objective is to sustain the unity of the work arguing in favor of using “the results attained in its II part to solve the problems presented in the I”. Parmenides” exercise on the One and the Others proposes a reformulation of dialectics. It denounces the deficiency in Zeno’s practice of reducing to absurdity the consequences of the hypothesis “if there are many”. Instead it examines the consequences of “If there is One” relating the One to itself and to each of the Others; then the Others in relation to themselves and to whatever other thing, first asserting the hypothesis and then denying it.fr-FR
dc.descriptionThis text aims at illuminating some of the roles played by the notion of “aporia” in Plato’s Parmenides. Having described some of its uses in Plato’s dialogues, it concentrates on the Parmenides, analyzing: 1. Socrates’ debate with Zeno; 2. The set of objections presented by Parmenides to Socrates’ use of “separation” and “participation”, focusing on the “Third Man Argument”; 3. Some paradoxical conclusions resulting from the eight “Hypotheses on the One”, in the second part of the dialogue. Our objective is to sustain the unity of the work arguing in favor of using “the results attained in its II part to solve the problems presented in the I”. Parmenides” exercise on the One and the Others proposes a reformulation of dialectics. It denounces the deficiency in Zeno’s practice of reducing to absurdity the consequences of the hypothesis “if there are many”. Instead it examines the consequences of “If there is One” relating the One to itself and to each of the Others; then the Others in relation to themselves and to whatever other thing, first asserting the hypothesis and then denying it. it-IT
dc.descriptionO objetivo deste texto é evidenciar o papel desempenhado pela noção de “aporia” no Parménides de Platão. Depois de ter descrito alguns dos usos da noção nos diálogos platónicos, o texto concentra-se no Parménides, analisando: 1. O debate de Sócrates com Zenão; 2. O conjunto de objeções apresentadas por Parménides ao uso por Sócrates das noções de “separação” e “participação”, focadas em particular no “Argumento do Terceiro Homem”; 3. Algumas conclusões paradoxais resultantes das oito “Hipóteses sobre o Um”, na segunda parte do diálogo. Com o objetivo de sustentar a unidade da Obra, argumentando a favor do uso dos “resultados atingidos na II parte do diálogo para resolver os problemas levantados na I”, defendemos que o exercício de Parménides sobre o Um e os Outros propõe uma reformulação da dialética, denunciando a deficiência da prática atribuída a Zenão, de reduzir ao absurdo as consequências da hipótese “Se há muitos”. Em vez disso, o Eleata examina as consequências de “Se há Um”, mediante a relacionação do Um consigo próprio e com cada um dos Outros; depois dos Outros consigo próprios e com quaisquer outros, primeiro afirmando, depois negando, a hipótese.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Mariapt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43307/pdf
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43307/html
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2020 Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofiapt-BR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Bd. 11 Nr. 1 (2020): Dossier Der "Parmenides" Platons + Schopenhauer-Studien; 22 - 33de-DE
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Dossier Plato's "Parmenides" + Schopenhauerian Studies; 22 - 33en-US
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Dossier El "Parménides" de Platon + Estudios Schopenhauerianos; 22 - 33es-ES
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 No 1 (2020): Dossiê O "Parmênides" de Platão + Estudos Schopenhauerianos; 22 - 33fr-FR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; V. 11 N. 1 (2020): Dossier Il "Parmenide" di Platone + Studi Schopenhaueriani; 22 - 33it-IT
dc.sourceVoluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 1 (2020): Dossiê O "Parmênides" de Platão + Estudos Schopenhauerianos; 22 - 33pt-BR
dc.source2179-3786
dc.subjectPlatode-DE
dc.subject“Parmenides”de-DE
dc.subjectAporiade-DE
dc.subject“Third Man”de-DE
dc.subjectPredicationde-DE
dc.subjectSelf-predicationde-DE
dc.subjectPlatoen-US
dc.subject“Parmenides”en-US
dc.subjectAporiaen-US
dc.subject“Third Man”en-US
dc.subjectPredicationen-US
dc.subjectSelf-predicationen-US
dc.subjectPlatoes-ES
dc.subject“Parmenides”es-ES
dc.subjectAporiaes-ES
dc.subject“Third Man”es-ES
dc.subjectPredicationes-ES
dc.subjectSelf-predicationes-ES
dc.subjectPlatofr-FR
dc.subject“Parmenides”fr-FR
dc.subjectAporiafr-FR
dc.subject“Third Man”fr-FR
dc.subjectPredicationfr-FR
dc.subjectSelf-predicationfr-FR
dc.subjectPlatoit-IT
dc.subject“Parmenides”it-IT
dc.subjectAporiait-IT
dc.subject“Third Man”it-IT
dc.subjectPredicationit-IT
dc.subjectSelf-predicationit-IT
dc.subjectPlatãopt-BR
dc.subject“Parménides”pt-BR
dc.subjectAporiapt-BR
dc.subject“Terceiro Homem”pt-BR
dc.subjectPredicaçãopt-BR
dc.subjectAutopredicaçãopt-BR
dc.titleThe “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialoguede-DE
dc.titleThe “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialogueen-US
dc.titleThe “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialoguees-ES
dc.titleThe “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialoguefr-FR
dc.titleThe “Parmenides” as an aporetic dialogueit-IT
dc.titleO "Parménides" como diálogo aporéticopt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución