Plato’s “Parmenides” revisited

Plato’s “Parmenides” revisited;
Plato’s “Parmenides” revisited;
Plato’s “Parmenides” revisited;
Plato’s “Parmenides” revisited;
O "Parmênides" de Platão revisitado

dc.creatorRickless, Samuel
dc.date2020-04-15
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T19:49:00Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T19:49:00Z
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43269
dc.identifier10.5902/2179378643269
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8942219
dc.descriptionPlato’s Parmenides is a notoriously challenging dialogue. To provide a completely satisfying interpretation of it, each argument needs to be reconstructed on its own terms and if all the reconstructions are accurate, the logical interconnections among the arguments of both parts of the dialogue should reveal the overall message of the Parmenides. Here I would like to summarize my interpretation, and consider a few prominent objections and alternatives to it, particularly as they appear in the work of Constance Meinwald and Mary Louise Gill. I want to explain why Meinwald’s interpretation is significantly less persuasive than mine and, because Gill and I reach similar conclusions, I want to highlight the important differences between our interpretations.de-DE
dc.descriptionPlato’s Parmenides is a notoriously challenging dialogue. To provide a completely satisfying interpretation of it, each argument needs to be reconstructed on its own terms and if all the reconstructions are accurate, the logical interconnections among the arguments of both parts of the dialogue should reveal the overall message of the Parmenides. Here I would like to summarize my interpretation, and consider a few prominent objections and alternatives to it, particularly as they appear in the work of Constance Meinwald and Mary Louise Gill. I want to explain why Meinwald’s interpretation is significantly less persuasive than mine and, because Gill and I reach similar conclusions, I want to highlight the important differences between our interpretations.en-US
dc.descriptionPlato’s Parmenides is a notoriously challenging dialogue. To provide a completely satisfying interpretation of it, each argument needs to be reconstructed on its own terms and if all the reconstructions are accurate, the logical interconnections among the arguments of both parts of the dialogue should reveal the overall message of the Parmenides. Here I would like to summarize my interpretation, and consider a few prominent objections and alternatives to it, particularly as they appear in the work of Constance Meinwald and Mary Louise Gill. I want to explain why Meinwald’s interpretation is significantly less persuasive than mine and, because Gill and I reach similar conclusions, I want to highlight the important differences between our interpretations.es-ES
dc.descriptionPlato’s Parmenides is a notoriously challenging dialogue. To provide a completely satisfying interpretation of it, each argument needs to be reconstructed on its own terms and if all the reconstructions are accurate, the logical interconnections among the arguments of both parts of the dialogue should reveal the overall message of the Parmenides. Here I would like to summarize my interpretation, and consider a few prominent objections and alternatives to it, particularly as they appear in the work of Constance Meinwald and Mary Louise Gill. I want to explain why Meinwald’s interpretation is significantly less persuasive than mine and, because Gill and I reach similar conclusions, I want to highlight the important differences between our interpretations.fr-FR
dc.descriptionPlato’s Parmenides is a notoriously challenging dialogue. To provide a completely satisfying interpretation of it, each argument needs to be reconstructed on its own terms and if all the reconstructions are accurate, the logical interconnections among the arguments of both parts of the dialogue should reveal the overall message of the Parmenides. Here I would like to summarize my interpretation, and consider a few prominent objections and alternatives to it, particularly as they appear in the work of Constance Meinwald and Mary Louise Gill. I want to explain why Meinwald’s interpretation is significantly less persuasive than mine and, because Gill and I reach similar conclusions, I want to highlight the important differences between our interpretations.it-IT
dc.descriptionO Parmênides de Platão é um diálogo notoriamente desafiador. Para apresentar uma interpretação completamente satisfatória dele, cada argumento precisa ser reconstruído em seus próprios termos e se todas as reconstruções forem acuradas, as interconexões lógicas entre os argumentos de ambas as partes do diálogo devem revelar a mensagem geral do Parmênides. Aqui gostaria de resumir minha interpretação e considerar algumas importantes objeções e alternativas a ela, particularmente como estas aparecem nos trabalhos de Constance Meinwald e Mary Louise Gill. Quero explicar por que a interpretação de Meinwald é significativamente menos convincente do que a minha e, como Gill e eu chegamos a conclusões semelhantes, quero destacar as diferenças importantes entre nossas interpretações.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Mariapt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43269/pdf
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/43269/html
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2020 Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofiapt-BR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Bd. 11 Nr. 1 (2020): Dossier Der "Parmenides" Platons + Schopenhauer-Studien; 8 - 21de-DE
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Dossier Plato's "Parmenides" + Schopenhauerian Studies; 8 - 21en-US
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Dossier El "Parménides" de Platon + Estudios Schopenhauerianos; 8 - 21es-ES
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 11 No 1 (2020): Dossiê O "Parmênides" de Platão + Estudos Schopenhauerianos; 8 - 21fr-FR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; V. 11 N. 1 (2020): Dossier Il "Parmenide" di Platone + Studi Schopenhaueriani; 8 - 21it-IT
dc.sourceVoluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 11 n. 1 (2020): Dossiê O "Parmênides" de Platão + Estudos Schopenhauerianos; 8 - 21pt-BR
dc.source2179-3786
dc.subjectParmenidesde-DE
dc.subjectImpurity of the Sensiblesde-DE
dc.subjectPurity of the Formsde-DE
dc.subjectParticipationde-DE
dc.subjectDeductionsde-DE
dc.subjectParmenidesen-US
dc.subjectImpurity of the Sensiblesen-US
dc.subjectPurity of the Formsen-US
dc.subjectParticipationen-US
dc.subjectDeductionsen-US
dc.subjectParmenideses-ES
dc.subjectImpurity of the Sensibleses-ES
dc.subjectPurity of the Formses-ES
dc.subjectParticipationes-ES
dc.subjectDeductionses-ES
dc.subjectParmenidesfr-FR
dc.subjectImpurity of the Sensiblesfr-FR
dc.subjectPurity of the Formsfr-FR
dc.subjectParticipationfr-FR
dc.subjectDeductionsfr-FR
dc.subjectParmenidesit-IT
dc.subjectImpurity of the Sensiblesit-IT
dc.subjectPurity of the Formsit-IT
dc.subjectParticipationit-IT
dc.subjectDeductionsit-IT
dc.subjectParmênidespt-BR
dc.subjectImpureza dos sensíveispt-BR
dc.subjectPureza das Formaspt-BR
dc.subjectParticipaçãopt-BR
dc.subjectDeduçõespt-BR
dc.titlePlato’s “Parmenides” revisitedde-DE
dc.titlePlato’s “Parmenides” revisiteden-US
dc.titlePlato’s “Parmenides” revisitedes-ES
dc.titlePlato’s “Parmenides” revisitedfr-FR
dc.titlePlato’s “Parmenides” revisitedit-IT
dc.titleO "Parmênides" de Platão revisitadopt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución