Animality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauer

Animality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauer;
Animality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauer;
Animality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauer;
Animality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauer;
Animalidade e apostasia da vontade: Nietzsche vê Schopenhauer

dc.creatorKrieger, Saulo
dc.date2019-12-18
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T19:48:55Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T19:48:55Z
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/40128
dc.identifier10.5902/2179378640128
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8942204
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this article is to clarify how the Janus face of Schopenhauer´s philosophy guided the relation between Nietzsche and the author of The World as Will and Representation. This aspect has been neglected by the Nietzsche research, perhaps judging this relation as a topic exhausted in pairings such as “adherence and rupture”, “enchantment and estrangement”, “pessimism and life affirmation”. That said, at a first preliminary moment we will analyze the dual face of Schopenhauer`s philosophy, with his gaze simultaneously towards past and future. At a second preliminary moment, we will approach Schopenhauer´s daring attitude of converting philosopher´s failed ambitions (thinking, of course, on the thing-in-itself) on the unconscious principle of the will. From them on, we are going to tackle Nietzsche´s grasp of Schopenhauer as a philosopher who, vulnerable to his second nature, a German nature, avoid featuring the very tragic philosophy that he reaches to touch, in the favor of a metaphysical treatment of his audacious discovery – the unconscious in human species.de-DE
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this article is to clarify how the Janus face of Schopenhauer´s philosophy guided the relation between Nietzsche and the author of The World as Will and Representation. This aspect has been neglected by the Nietzsche research, perhaps judging this relation as a topic exhausted in pairings such as “adherence and rupture”, “enchantment and estrangement”, “pessimism and life affirmation”. That said, at a first preliminary moment we will analyze the dual face of Schopenhauer`s philosophy, with his gaze simultaneously towards past and future. At a second preliminary moment, we will approach Schopenhauer´s daring attitude of converting philosopher´s failed ambitions (thinking, of course, on the thing-in-itself) on the unconscious principle of the will. From them on, we are going to tackle Nietzsche´s grasp of Schopenhauer as a philosopher who, vulnerable to his second nature, a German nature, avoid featuring the very tragic philosophy that he reaches to touch, in the favor of a metaphysical treatment of his audacious discovery – the unconscious in human species.en-US
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this article is to clarify how the Janus face of Schopenhauer´s philosophy guided the relation between Nietzsche and the author of The World as Will and Representation. This aspect has been neglected by the Nietzsche research, perhaps judging this relation as a topic exhausted in pairings such as “adherence and rupture”, “enchantment and estrangement”, “pessimism and life affirmation”. That said, at a first preliminary moment we will analyze the dual face of Schopenhauer`s philosophy, with his gaze simultaneously towards past and future. At a second preliminary moment, we will approach Schopenhauer´s daring attitude of converting philosopher´s failed ambitions (thinking, of course, on the thing-in-itself) on the unconscious principle of the will. From them on, we are going to tackle Nietzsche´s grasp of Schopenhauer as a philosopher who, vulnerable to his second nature, a German nature, avoid featuring the very tragic philosophy that he reaches to touch, in the favor of a metaphysical treatment of his audacious discovery – the unconscious in human species.es-ES
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this article is to clarify how the Janus face of Schopenhauer´s philosophy guided the relation between Nietzsche and the author of The World as Will and Representation. This aspect has been neglected by the Nietzsche research, perhaps judging this relation as a topic exhausted in pairings such as “adherence and rupture”, “enchantment and estrangement”, “pessimism and life affirmation”. That said, at a first preliminary moment we will analyze the dual face of Schopenhauer`s philosophy, with his gaze simultaneously towards past and future. At a second preliminary moment, we will approach Schopenhauer´s daring attitude of converting philosopher´s failed ambitions (thinking, of course, on the thing-in-itself) on the unconscious principle of the will. From them on, we are going to tackle Nietzsche´s grasp of Schopenhauer as a philosopher who, vulnerable to his second nature, a German nature, avoid featuring the very tragic philosophy that he reaches to touch, in the favor of a metaphysical treatment of his audacious discovery – the unconscious in human species.fr-FR
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this article is to clarify how the Janus face of Schopenhauer´s philosophy guided the relation between Nietzsche and the author of The World as Will and Representation. This aspect has been neglected by the Nietzsche research, perhaps judging this relation as a topic exhausted in pairings such as “adherence and rupture”, “enchantment and estrangement”, “pessimism and life affirmation”. That said, at a first preliminary moment we will analyze the dual face of Schopenhauer`s philosophy, with his gaze simultaneously towards past and future. At a second preliminary moment, we will approach Schopenhauer´s daring attitude of converting philosopher´s failed ambitions (thinking, of course, on the thing-in-itself) on the unconscious principle of the will. From them on, we are going to tackle Nietzsche´s grasp of Schopenhauer as a philosopher who, vulnerable to his second nature, a German nature, avoid featuring the very tragic philosophy that he reaches to touch, in the favor of a metaphysical treatment of his audacious discovery – the unconscious in human species.it-IT
dc.descriptionO objetivo deste artigo é fazer ver de que modo o caráter de Janus – do mito de Janus – da filosofia de Schopenhauer pautou a relação que com ela entabulou a filosofia de Nietzsche –, aspecto este um tanto relegado pela pesquisa Nietzsche, talvez justamente por se tomar a relação entre ambos como exaurida em binômios do tipo “adesão e ruptura”, “encantamento e distanciamento crítico", “pessimismo e afirmação da vida”. Assim sendo, num primeiro momento preliminar procederemos a analisar a face dual da filosofia de Schopenhauer, cujo olhar se volta simultaneamente ao passado e ao futuro. Num segundo momento preliminar visitaremos a ousadia de Schopenhauer ao converter as ambições malogradas da filosofia (na figura da “coisa em si”) no princípio inconsciente da vontade. A partir daí passaremos à compreensão de Schopenhauer por Nietzsche ao modo de um filósofo que, vitimado por sua segunda natureza, alemã, esquiva-se de protagonizar a filosofia trágica, que chegou a tangenciar, em função do esquadrinhamento metafísico de sua arrojada descoberta – o inconsciente na espécie humana.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Mariapt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/40128/pdf
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/40128/html
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2019 Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofiapt-BR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Bd. 10 Nr. 3 (2019): Dossier Philosophien des Gedächtnis + Schopenhauer-Studien; 230 - 253de-DE
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019): Dossier Philosophies of Memory + Schopenhauerian Studies; 230 - 253en-US
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2019): Dossier Philosophies of Memory + Schopenhauerian Studies; 230 - 253es-ES
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 10 No 3 (2019): Dossiê Filosofias da Memória + Estudos Schopenhaurianos; 230 - 253fr-FR
dc.sourceVoluntas: International Journal of Philosophy; V. 10 N. 3 (2019): Dossier Filosofie della memoria + Studi Schopenhaueriani; 230 - 253it-IT
dc.sourceVoluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 10 n. 3 (2019): Dossiê Filosofias da Memória + Estudos Schopenhaurianos; 230 - 253pt-BR
dc.source2179-3786
dc.subjectMetaphysicsde-DE
dc.subjectUnconsciousde-DE
dc.subjectPersonal experiencede-DE
dc.subjectTragicde-DE
dc.subjectMetaphysicsen-US
dc.subjectUnconsciousen-US
dc.subjectPersonal experienceen-US
dc.subjectTragicen-US
dc.subjectMetaphysicses-ES
dc.subjectUnconsciouses-ES
dc.subjectPersonal experiencees-ES
dc.subjectTragices-ES
dc.subjectMetaphysicsfr-FR
dc.subjectUnconsciousfr-FR
dc.subjectPersonal experiencefr-FR
dc.subjectTragicfr-FR
dc.subjectMetaphysicsit-IT
dc.subjectUnconsciousit-IT
dc.subjectPersonal experienceit-IT
dc.subjectTragicit-IT
dc.subjectMetafísicapt-BR
dc.subjectInconscientept-BR
dc.subjectVivênciapt-BR
dc.subjectTrágicopt-BR
dc.titleAnimality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauerde-DE
dc.titleAnimality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhaueren-US
dc.titleAnimality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhaueres-ES
dc.titleAnimality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauerfr-FR
dc.titleAnimality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauerit-IT
dc.titleAnimalidade e apostasia da vontade: Nietzsche vê Schopenhauerpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución