Article
Itraconazole vs. trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole: a comparative cohort study of 200 patients with paracoccidioidomycosis
Registro en:
BORGES, Sheila Rocha Conceição et al. Itraconazole vs. trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole: a comparative cohort study of 200 patients with paracoccidioidomycosis. Medical Mycology, v. 52, n. 3, p. 303-310, 2014.
1369-3786
10.1093/mmy/myt012
1460-2709
Autor
Borges, Sheila Rocha Conceição
Silva, Gilberto Marcelo Sperandio da
Chambela, Mayara da Costa
Oliveira, Raquel de Vasconcelos Carvalhães
Costa, Regina Lana Braga
Wanke, Bodo
Valle, Antonio Carlos Francesconi do
Resumen
The Evandro Chagas Clinical Research Institute, Oswaldo Cruz
Foundation (FIOCRUZ), funded this study. Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is a systemic mycosis endemic to Latin America. Brazil accounts for approximately 80% of cases, where it represents a major public health issue due to its disabling impact and the number of premature deaths it causes. We present a retrospective cohort study that was conducted in order to better understand factors that relate to cure of the infection in the treatment of 200 patients with PCM. We evaluated the influence of sociodemographic and clinical factors as well as therapeutic regimen (trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole [TMP–SMX] and itraconazole) on the progress of PCM (cure and noncure). There was a higher incidence of cure (83%) among patients who regularly received treatment for their infections and completed the treatment protocol. Moreover, itraconazole (86.4%) was significantly superior to TMP–SMX (51.3%) in terms of cure rate and had a median treatment period that was significantly shorter (12 months) than that for TMP–SMX (23 months). A Cox proportional hazard regression model showed that use of itraconazole increased the hazard of cure, regardless of sex, age, education, clinical form, completion of treatment, and regularity. Although the results of this study show that itraconazole was the best treatment option for PCM patients, a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial is necessary to confirm this conclusion.