Reliability of bioimpedance and indirect calorimetry to evaluate resting metabolic rate in brazilian women with metabolic syndrome

dc.creatorBentes, Claudio Melibeu
dc.creatorSilveira, Anderson Luiz Bezerra da
dc.creatorDi Masi, Fabrízio
dc.creatorNetto, Claudia
dc.creatorMarinheiro, Lizanka Paola Figueiredo
dc.date2021-11-23T19:21:19Z
dc.date2021-11-23T19:21:19Z
dc.date2021
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-26T23:26:45Z
dc.date.available2023-09-26T23:26:45Z
dc.identifierBENTES, Claudio Melibeu et al. Reliability of bioimpedance and indirect calorimetry to evaluate resting metabolic rate in brazilian women with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, v. 15, n. 2, p. 493-497, Mar./Apr. 2021.
dc.identifier1871-4021
dc.identifierhttps://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/49989
dc.identifier10.1016/j.dsx.2021.02.018
dc.identifier1871-4021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8890642
dc.descriptionResearch and Development Foundation of Rio de Janeiro State (FAPERJ)
dc.descriptionPrograma Pesquisa para o SUS
dc.descriptionCoordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES/Brazil)
dc.descriptionBackground and aims: Precise evaluation of resting metabolic rate (RMR) is critical, especially for seniors in syndromes conditions. The study aimed to compare different methods and devices to evaluate the resting metabolic rate and assess them’ reliability in Brazilian women with metabolic syndrome. Methods: A single-center prospective study with forty elderly postmenopausal women was performed to verify the reliability of indirect calorimetry (IC) versus Bioimpedance (BIA) on RMR fluctuations for an interval length of six months. Results: Measurements showed a high correlation between devices at baseline [BIA vs IC, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ¼ 0.906 (0.822e0.950)]. Surprisingly, a high correlation was kept between BIA and IC after six months [BIA vs. IC, ICC ¼ 0.909 (0.829e0.952)]. The results suggest that both BIA and IC are excellent strategies to measure RMR in elderly postmenopausal women and with metabolic syndrome. Conclusions: However, the BIA method presents greater convenience, optimizes patients’ time, and does not require prolonged fasting to obtain good reliable results compared to IC.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsrestricted access
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectBasal Metabolism / physiology
dc.subjectBody Composition / physiology
dc.subjectBrazil / epidemiology
dc.subjectCalorimetry, Indirect / standards
dc.subjectElectric Impedance
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMetabolic Syndrome / blood
dc.subjectMetabolic Syndrome / diagnosis
dc.subjectMetabolic Syndrome / epidemiology
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPostmenopause / blood
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectReproducibility
dc.subjectBasal metabolism
dc.subjectMetabolic diseases
dc.subjectMenopause
dc.titleReliability of bioimpedance and indirect calorimetry to evaluate resting metabolic rate in brazilian women with metabolic syndrome
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución