Article
LUMINEXW: a new technology for the simultaneous identification of five Entamoeba spp. commonly found in human stools
Registro en:
SANTOS, Helena Lúcia Carneiro; et al. LUMINEXW: a new technology for the simultaneous identification of five Entamoeba spp. commonly found in human stools. Parasites & Vectors, v.6, n.60, 9p, 2013.
1756-3305
10.1186/1756-3305-6-69
Autor
Santos, Helena Lúcia Carneiro
Bandyopadhyay, Kalali
Bandea, Rebecca
Peralta, Regina Helena Saramago
Peralta, José Mauro
Silva, Alexandre Januário da
Resumen
Background: Six species of the genus Entamoeba, i.e., E. histolytica, E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, E. polecki, E. coli, and E.
hartmanii can be found in human stools. Among these, only E. histolytica is considered to be pathogenic, causing
intestinal and extra-intestinal disease, but it is morphologically identical to E. dispar and E. moshkovskii. In general, E.
polecki, E. coli, and E. hartmanii can be differentiated morphologically from E. histolytica, but some of their diagnostic
morphologic features may overlap creating issues for the differential diagnosis. Moreover, the previous inability to
differentiate among Entamoeba species has limited epidemiologic information on E histolytica. The objective of this study
was to develop a rapid, high-throughput screening method using Luminex technique for the simultaneous detection and
differentiation of Entamoeba species.
Methods: PCR amplification was performed with biotinylated Entamoeba sp 18S rRNA gene primers, designed to amplify
a fragment ranging from 382 to 429 bp of the Entamoeba spp studied. Regions of this fragment that could differentiate
among E. histolytica, E. moshkovskii, E. dispar, E. hartmanii and E. coli were selected to design hybridization probes to link
to Luminex beads. The assay was standardized with cloned DNA samples of each species and evaluated with 24 DNA
extracts from samples obtained from individuals diagnosed with these amebas in their stools.
Results: Using this approach we were able to correctly identify E. histoltyica, E. dispar, E hartmanni, E. coli and E. moshkovskii
in all specimens studied. From twenty four samples tested by microscopy, PCR/DNA Sequencing and real-time PCR, 100%
agreed with PCR-Luminex assay for identification of E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, E. hartmanni, E. histolytica, and E. coli.
Conclusion: These results show that this method could be used in the diagnostic detection of Entamoeba spp in fecal
samples. This diagnostic test was useful to clearly distinguish E histolytica from other species and also to strengthen
epidemiologic data on Entamoeba spp.