The association between diabetes mellitus and lower urinary tract dysfunctions in women assisted in a reference service

dc.creatorOliveira, Eneida Gonçalves de
dc.creatorMarinheiro, Lizanka Paola Figueiredo
dc.creatorSilva, Kátia Silveira da
dc.date2012-12-17T11:08:10Z
dc.date2012-12-17T11:08:10Z
dc.date2011
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-26T21:06:25Z
dc.date.available2023-09-26T21:06:25Z
dc.identifierOLIVEIRA, Eneida Gonçalves de. et al. Diabetes melito como fator associado às disfunções do trato urinário inferior em mulheres atendidas em serviço de referência. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet., Rio de Janeiro, v. 33, n. 12, p. 414-420, dec. 2011.
dc.identifier0100-7203
dc.identifierhttps://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/6006
dc.identifier10.1590/S0100-72032011001200007
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8869251
dc.descriptionOBJETIVO: Descrever as disfunções do trato urinário inferior e as características demográficas e clínicas de mulheres com queixas urinárias, estimando a prevalência de diabetes melito e de alterações urodinâmicas nestas mulheres. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional, transversal, retrospectivo, com análise de 578 prontuários. As prevalências de diabetes melito e de cada diagnóstico urodinâmico nas pacientes com disfunções do trato urinário inferior foram estimadas, com seus respectivos intervalos de confiança de 95%. Foram calculadas as razões de prevalência das alterações urodinâmicas segundo o diagnóstico de diabetes. RESULTADOS: Setenta e sete pacientes (13,3%) eram diabéticas e a maioria (96,1%) tinha diabetes tipo 2. O diagnóstico urodinâmico mais frequente nas pacientes diabéticas foi o de incontinência urinária de esforço (39%), seguido de hiperatividade do detrusor (23,4%). A prevalência de urodinâmica alterada foi associada à de diabetes melito (RP=1,31; IC95%=1,17-1,48). As alterações de contratilidade do detrusor (hiper ou hipoatividade) estiveram presentes em 42,8% das pacientes diabéticas e em 31,5% das não diabéticas. CONCLUSÕES: As mulheres diabéticas apresentaram maior prevalência de alterações urodinâmicas do que as não diabéticas. Não houve associação entre o diabetes e as alterações de contratilidade do detrusor (p=0,80).
dc.descriptionPURPOSE: to describe lower urinary tract dysfunctions and clinical demographic characteristics of patients with urinary symptoms. This study assessed the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and urodynamic changes in these women. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective study on 578 women. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and urodynamic diagnoses was assessed in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunctions, with their respective 95% confidence intervals. The prevalence ratios of urodynamic alterations were calculated according to the diabetes mellitus diagnoses. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (13.3%) had diabetes and type 2 diabetes was predominant (96.1%). Stress urinary incontinence was the most frequent urodynamic diagnosis (39%) in diabetic patients, followed by detrusor overactivity (23.4%). The prevalence of urodynamic alterations was associated with diabetes (PR=1.31; 95%CI=1.17-1.48). Changes in detrusor contractility (over- or underactivity) were diagnosed in 42.8% diabetic patients and in 31.5% non-diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic women had a greater prevalence of urodynamic alterations than the non-diabetic ones. There was no association between diabetes mellitus and detrusor contractility alterations (p=0.80).
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherFederação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia
dc.relationHaylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5-26.
dc.relationBrown JS, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Nyberg LM, Kusek JW, Kanaya AM. Prevalence and risk factors for urinary incontinence in women with type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2002. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(6):1307-12.
dc.relationWan EC, Gordon TP, Jackson MW. Autoantibody-mediated bladder dysfunction in type 1 diabetes. Scand J Immunol. 2007;65(1):70-5.
dc.relationGomez CS, Kanagarajah P, Gousse AE. Bladder dysfunction in patients with diabetes. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(6):419-26.
dc.relationDoshi AM, Van Den Eeden SK, Morrill MY, Schembri M, Thom DH, Brown JS, et al. Women with diabetes: understanding urinary incontinence and help seeking behavior. J Urol. 2010;184(4):1402-7.
dc.relationZhang YX, Xu HN, Xia ZJ, Wu B. Analysis of clinical interventional strategy for women with urinary incontinence complicated with diabetes mellitus. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Sep 29. [Epub ahead of print]
dc.relationYoshimura N, Chancellor MB, Andersson KE, Christ GJ. Recent advances in understanding the biology of diabetes-associated bladder complications and novel therapy. BJU Int. 2005;95(6):733-8.
dc.relationMarkland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, Eggers P, Kusek JW. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol. 2011;186(2):589-93.
dc.relationKaplan SA, Te AE, Blaivas JG. Urodynamic findings in patients with diabetic cystopathy. J Urol. 1995;153(2):342-4.
dc.relationAbrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmstn U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):116-26.
dc.relationWorld Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneva: WHO; 1995. (Technical Report Series, 854).
dc.relationAmerican Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33 Suppl 1:S62-9.
dc.relationJackson SL, Scholes D, Boyko EJ, Abraham L, Fihn SD. Urinary incontinence and diabetes in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(7):1730-8.
dc.relationRizk DE, Padmanabhan RK, Tariq S, Shafiullah M, Ahmed I. Ultra-structural morphological abnormalities of the urinary bladder in streptozotocin-induced diabetic female rats. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(2):143-54.
dc.relationHashim H, Abrams P. Overactive bladder: an update. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17(4):231-6.
dc.relationTorquato MT, Montenegro Júnior RM, Viana LA, Souza RA, Lanna CM, Lucas JC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in the urban population aged 30-69 years in Ribeirão Preto (São Paulo), Brazil. São Paulo Med J. 2005;121(6):224-30.
dc.relationPassos VM, Barreto SM, Diniz LM, Lima-Costa MF. Type 2 diabetes: prevalence and associated factors in a Brazilian community - the Bambuí health and aging study. São Paulo Med J. 2005;123(2): 66-71.
dc.relationSantos CRS, Santos VL. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in a random sample of the urban population of Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2010;18(5):903-10.
dc.relationStothers L, Friedman B. Risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):363-9.
dc.relationHsieh CH, Hsu CS, Su TH, Chang ST, Lee MC. Risk factors for urinary incontinence in Taiwanese women aged 60 or over. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(11):1325-9.
dc.relationHsieh CH, Lee MS, Lee MC, Kuo TC, Hsu CS, Chang ST. Risk factors for urinary incontinence in Taiwanese women aged 20-59 years. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;47(2):197-202.
dc.relationTozun M, Ayranci U, Unsal A. Prevalence of urinary incontinence among women and its impact on quality of life in a semirural area of Western Turkey. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;67(4):241-9.
dc.relationLewis CM, Schrader R, Many A, Mackay M, Rogers RG. Diabetes and urinary incontinence in 50-to 90-year-old women: a cross-sectional population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):2154-8.
dc.relationIzci Y, Topsever P, Filiz TM, Çinar ND, Uludag C, Lagro-Janssen T. The association between diabetes mellitus and urinary incontinence in adult women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(8): 947-52.
dc.relationLifford KL, Curhan GC, Hu FB, Barbieri RL, Grodstein F. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of developing urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(11):1851-7.
dc.relationDokmeci F, Seval M, Gok H. Comparison of ambulatory versus conventional urodynamics in females with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(4):518-21.
dc.relationKebapci N, Yenilmez A, Efe B, Entok E, Demirustu C. Bladder dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(6):814-9.
dc.relationKoubaa S, Ben Salah FZ, Miri I, Ghorbel S, Lebib S, Dziri C, et al. Neurogenic bladder in diabetes mellitus. Tunis Med. 2009;87(4):279-82.
dc.relationMcGrother CW, Donaldson MM, Hayward T, Matthews R, Dallosso HM, Hyde C, et al. Urinary storage symptoms and comorbidities: a prospective population cohort study in middle-aged and older women. Age Ageing. 2006;35(1):16-24.
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus
dc.subjectPrevalência
dc.subjectUrodinâmica
dc.subjectIncontinência Urinária
dc.subjectBexiga Urinária Hiperativa
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectUrodynamics
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinence
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder, Overactive
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus
dc.subjectComplicações do Diabetes
dc.subjectTranstornos Urinários
dc.subjectPrevalência
dc.titleDiabetes melito como fator associado às disfunções do trato urinário inferior em mulheres atendidas em serviço de referência
dc.titleThe association between diabetes mellitus and lower urinary tract dysfunctions in women assisted in a reference service
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución