Article
A multinational, multidisciplinary consensus for the diagnosis and management of spinal cord compression among patients with mucopolysaccharidosis VI
Registro en:
SOLANKI, Guirish A. et al. A multinational, multidisciplinary consensus for the diagnosis and management of spinal cord compression among patients with mucopolysaccharidosis VI. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Orlando, v. 107, p. 15-24, 2012.
1096-7192
10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.07.018
Autor
Solanki, Guirish A.
Alden, Tord D.
Burton, Barbara K.
Giugliani, Roberto
Horovitz, Dafne Dain Gandelman
Jones, Simon A.
Lampe, Christina
Martin, Kenneth W.
Ryan, Maura E.
Schaefer, Matthias K.
Siddiqui, Aisha
White, Klane K.
Harmatz, Paul
Resumen
Cervical cord compression is a sequela of mucopolysaccharidosis VI, a rare lysosomal storage disorder, and has
devastating consequences. An international panel of orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, anesthesiologists,
neuroradiologists, metabolic pediatricians, and geneticists pooled their clinical expertise to codify recommenda-tions for diagnosing, monitoring, and managing cervical cord compression; for surgical intervention criteria; and
for best airway management practices during imaging or anesthesia. The recommendations offer ideal best prac-tices but also attempt to recognize the worldwide spectrum of resource availability.
Functional assessments and clinical neurological examinations remain the cornerstone for identification of early
signs ofmyelopathy, butmagnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for identificationof cervical cord com-pression. Difficult airways of MPS VI patients complicate the anesthetic and, thus, the surgical management of
cervical cord compression. All patients with MPS VI require expert airway management during any surgical pro-cedure. Neurophysiological monitoring of the MPS VI patient during complex spine or head and neck surgery is
considered standard practice but should also be considered for other procedures performed with the patient
under general anesthesia, depending on the lengthand type of theprocedure. Surgical interventionsmay include
cervical decompression, stabilization, or both. Specific techniques vary widely among surgeons.
The onset, presentation, and rate of progression of cervical cord compression vary among patients with MPS
VI. The availability of medical resources, the expertise and experience of members of the treatment team, and
the standard treatment practices vary among centers of expertise. Referral to specialized, experienced MPS
treatment centers should be considered for high-risk patients and those requiring complex procedures.
Therefore, the key to optimal patient care is to implement best practices through meaningful communication
among treatment team members at each center and among MPS VI specialists worldwide.