Article
A Time-Based and Intratumoral Proteomic Assessment of a Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme
Registro en:
AQUINO Priscila F. de et. al. A Time-Based and Intratumoral Proteomic Assessment of a Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. Frontiers in Oncology, v. 6, n. 183, p. 1-10, 2016.
2234-943X
10.3389/fonc.2016.00183
Autor
Aquino, Priscila Ferreira de
Carvalho, Paulo Costa
Nogueira, Fábio Cesar Sousa
Fonseca, Clóvis Orlando da
Silva, Júlio Cesar Thomé de Souza
Carvalho, Maria da Gloria da Costa
Domont, Gilberto B.
Zanchin, Nilson Ivo Tonin
Fischer, Juliana de Saldanha da Gama
Resumen
Tumors consist of cells in different stages of transformation with molecular and cellular heterogeneity. By far, heterogeneity is the hallmark of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most malignant and aggressive type of glioma. Most proteomic studies aim in comparing tumors from different patients, but here we dive into exploring the intratumoral proteome diversity of a single GBM. For this, we profiled tumor fragments from the profound region of the same patient’s GBM but obtained from two surgeries a year’s time apart. Our analysis also included GBM‘s fragments from different anatomical regions. Our quantitative proteomic strategy employed 4-plex iTRAQ peptide labeling followed by a four-step strong cation chromatographic separation; each fraction was then analyzed
by reversed-phase nano-chromatography coupled on-line with an Orbitrap-Velos mass spectrometer. Unsupervised clustering grouped the proteomic profiles into four major distinct groups and showed that most changes were related to the tumor’s anatomical region. Nevertheless, we report differentially abundant proteins from GBM’s fragments of the same region but obtained 1 year apart. We discuss several key proteins (e.g., S100A9) and enriched pathways linked with GBM such as the Ras pathway, RHO
GTPases activate PKNs, and those related to apoptosis, to name a few. As far as we know, this is the only report that compares GBM fragments proteomic profiles from the same patient. Ultimately, our results fuel the forefront of scientific discussion on the importance in exploring the richness of subproteomes within a single tissue sample for a better understanding of the disease, as each tumor is unique.