dc.creatorAlevy, Jonathan E.
dc.creatorCristi, Óscar
dc.creatorMelo Contreras, Óscar
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-10T13:33:12Z
dc.date.available2023-07-10T13:33:12Z
dc.date.created2023-07-10T13:33:12Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier10.1017/s1068280500007255
dc.identifier2372-2614
dc.identifier1068-2805
dc.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.1017/s1068280500007255
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/74131
dc.description.abstractField experiments were conducted with farmers in the Limari Valley of Chile to test extant theory on right-to-choose auctions. Water volumes that differed by reservoir source and time of availability were offered for sale by the research team. The auctions were supplemented by protocols to elicit risk and time preferences of bidders. We find that the right-to-choose auctions raise significantly more revenue than the benchmark sequential auction. Risk attitudes explain a substantial amount of the difference in bidding between auction institutions, consonant with received theory. The auction bidding revealed distinct preferences for water types, which has implications for market re-design
dc.languageen
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectWater market
dc.subjectField experiment
dc.subjectAuction design
dc.titleRight-to-Choose Auctions: A Field Study of Water Markets in the Limari Valley of Chile
dc.typeartículo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución