dc.creator | Lukrafka, J.L. | |
dc.creator | Fuchs, S.C. | |
dc.creator | Fischer, G.B. | |
dc.creator | Flores, J.A. | |
dc.creator | Fachel, J.M. | |
dc.creator | Castro-Rodriguez, J.A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-19T20:46:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-19T20:46:03Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-05-19T20:46:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302279 | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/69683 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background Chest physiotherapy has been used to treat children hospitalised with pneumonia with no clear scientific evidence to support a beneficial effect. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of chest physiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in children hospitalised with acute community-acquired pneumonia. | |
dc.description.abstract | Methods Children (aged 1-12 years) with a clinical and confirmed radiological diagnosis of pneumonia sequentially admitted to a tertiary children hospital were eligible for this study. Participants were randomly selected to receive a standardised respiratory physiotherapy (positioning, thoracic vibration, thoracic compression, positive expiratory pressure, breathing exercises and forced exhalation with the glottis open or 'huffing') three times daily in the 'intervention group' or a non-mandatory request to breathe deeply, expectorate the sputum and maintain a lateral body position once a day in the 'control group'. The primary outcomes were reduction in respiratory rate and severity score (respiratory rate, recession, fever, oxygen saturation and chest x-ray) from baseline to discharge. Secondary outcome was duration of hospitalisation. | |
dc.description.abstract | Results In all, 72 patients were randomly allocated to the intervention (n = 35) or control (n = 37) groups. There were no differences at admission on severity of pneumonia between groups. Respiratory rate and severity score significant decreased between admission to discharge within each group; however, there were no differences when comparing groups. Also, there was no significant difference in duration of hospitalisation between the control and intervention groups (6 vs 8 days, p = 0.11, respectively). | |
dc.description.abstract | Conclusions This clinical trial suggests that, in children hospitalised with moderate community-acquired pneumonia, chest physiotherapy did not have clinical benefits in comparison to control group. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.title | Chest physiotherapy in paediatric patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia: A randomised clinical trial | |
dc.type | artículo | |