Artigo
Immediate loading of implants installed in a healed alveolar bony ridge or immediately after tooth extraction: an experimental study in dogs
Registro en:
Clinical Oral Implants Research. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 26, n. 4, p. 435-441, 2015.
0905-7161
10.1111/clr.12389
WOS:000350755400023
Autor
Mainetti, Tomaso
Lang, Niklaus P.
Bengazi, Franco
Sbricoli, Luca
Cantero, Luis Soto
Botticelli, Daniele [UNESP]
Resumen
ObjectiveTo compare the sequential healing at immediately loaded implants installed in a healed alveolar bony ridge or immediately after tooth extraction.Material and methodsIn the mandible of 12 dogs, the second premolars were extracted. After 3months, the mesial roots of the third premolars were endodontically treated and the distal roots extracted. Implants were placed immediately into the extraction sockets (test) and in the second premolar region (control). Crowns were applied at the second and third maxillary premolars, and healing abutments of appropriate length were applied at both implants placed in the mandible and adapted to allow occlusal contacts with the crowns in the maxilla. The time of surgery and time of sacrifices were planned in such a way to obtain biopsies representing the healing after 1 and 2weeks and 1 and 3months. Ground sections were prepared for histological analyses.ResultsAt the control sites, a resorption of the buccal bone of 1mm was found after 1week and remained stable thereafter. At the test sites, the resorption was 0.4mm at 1-week period and further loss was observed after 1month. The height of the peri-implant soft tissue was 3.8mm both at test and control sites. Higher values of mineralized bone-to-implant contact and bone density were seen at the controls compared with the test sites. The differences, however, were not statistically significant.ConclusionsDifferent patterns of sequential early healing were found at implants installed in healed alveolar bone or in alveolar sockets immediately after tooth extractions. However, three months after implant installation, no statistically significant differences were found for the hard- and soft-tissue dimensions. Sweden &Martina SRL, Due Carrare, Padova, Italia ARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica SRL, Rimini, Italia Clinical Research Foundation (CRF) for the Promotion of Oral Health, Brienz, Switzerland Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Havana, Cuba Univ Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dent Hosp, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China Univ Padua, Sch Dent, Padua, Italy Ariminum Odontol, ARDEC, Rimini, Italy UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP Fac Odontol Aracatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil UNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia Araçatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil