dc.creatorMasoli, Daniela
dc.creatorMena, Patricia
dc.creatorDominguez, Angelica
dc.creatorRamolfo, Pamela
dc.creatorVernal, Patricia
dc.creatorPantoja, Miguel Angel
dc.creatorEsparza, Ruth
dc.creatorHübner, ME
dc.creatorRíos, Antonio
dc.creatorFaunes, Miriam
dc.creatorUauy, Ricardo
dc.creatorTapia, Jose L.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-07T15:37:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T16:07:15Z
dc.date.available2023-07-07T15:37:00Z
dc.date.available2023-08-30T16:07:15Z
dc.date.created2023-07-07T15:37:00Z
dc.identifierJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 74(3):p 424-430, March 2022.
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000003321
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.udd.cl/handle/11447/7651
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8528489
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate growth (weight, length, head circumference, and knee–heel length [KHL]) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (500–1500 g) who received human milk with a liquid fortifier (LHMF) with high protein and fatty acid content versus a traditional powder fortifier (PHMF) for 45 days or until discharge. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to determine adverse events and withdrawal causes. We also performed an efficacy analysis involving the infants who completed at least 2 weeks of study. Results: Of the 158 infants enrolled in the study, 146 completed at least 2 weeks, and 125 completed the entire study. The biodemographic characteristics were similar between groups, with no differences in increments of weight (22.9 vs 22.7 g kg1 day1 ), length (1.03 vs 1.09 cm/week), head circumference (0.91 vs 0.90 cm/week), or KHL (3.6 vs 3.3 mm/week). The KHL increment was greater in infants weighing >1 kg receiving LHMF (3.7 vs 3.2 mm/week, P ¼ 0.027). Although there were no significant differences in serious adverse events, the incidence difference of the composite outcome death/necrotizing enterocolitis between groups warrants attention (1.3% with LHMF and 8.1% with PHMF). Conclusion: There were no differences in the overall growth between VLBW infants receiving either fortifier.
dc.languageen
dc.subjectHuman milk fortifiers
dc.subjectNeonatal nutrition
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectVery low birthweight infants
dc.titleGrowth of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Who Received a Liquid Human Milk Fortifier: A Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución