Role of health professionals in the design, obtention and understanding of informed consent: A review

Papel de los profesionales de la salud en el diseño, obtención y entendimiento del consentimiento informado: Una revisión

dc.creatorCamargo Sánchez, Andrés
dc.creatorOlmos, Jessica
dc.creatorHiguera-Dagovett, Elkin
dc.creatorVargas, Rafael
dc.creatorBarreto, Ruth
dc.date2019-11-07
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T15:13:56Z
dc.date.available2023-08-28T15:13:56Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.udca.edu.co/index.php/ruadc/article/view/1164
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8442998
dc.descriptionInformed consent is a legal document signed by an individual who will undergo an intervention in the health area, or in the research field. This informed consent reflects the individual wellbeing and autonomy and his / her capacity, once he or she has been illustrated in detail about the intervention, to understand its main results and its potential risks of said intervention and his / her willingness to assume it without external pressure. Although this seems trivial, history shows that wellbeing and autonomy have not been considered values in the health area and lesser in research, intentionally or by omission. For the present review, a bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed, Medline, Scielo and Google Scholar databases. The following descriptors were used: history of research, ethics, informed consent, research, nursing and comprehension. We found 2800 articles, in English, Portuguese and Spanish, without time limit. Then after reading abstract of the Articles it was selected 80 articles that were close to the subject and there were used. As a result of the analysis of the information, some guidelines were generated aimed to improve the informed consent process through techniques that improve the explanation by the health professional and the understanding of the participant or patient.en-US
dc.descriptionEl consentimiento informado es un proceso que tiene la intención de autorizar o llegar a un acuerdo con el profesional para la realización de un procedimiento en el área de la salud o en el campo de la investigación, que se formaliza con la firma de un documento. Este consentimiento refleja la voluntad y la autonomía de dicho individuo y su capacidad, una vez ilustrado en detalle sobre la intervención, para entender los resultados principales y los potenciales riesgos de dicha intervención y su voluntad de asumirlos, sin presión externa. Aunque esto parece trivial, la historia muestra que voluntad y autonomía no han sido valores tenidos en cuenta en el área de la salud y menos en el campo de la investigación, de manera intencional o por omisión. Para la presente revisión, se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos PubMed, Medline, Scielo y Google Académico. Se utilizaron los siguientes descriptores: historia de la investigación, ética, consentimiento informado, investigación, enfermería y comprensión, encontrando 2.800 artículos, en idiomas inglés, portugués y español, sin restricción de un límite de tiempo; luego, se efectuó la lectura del resumen de los artículos, seleccionando los 80 que más se acercaban al tema y se emplearon. Como resultado del análisis de la información, se generaron algunas pautas orientadas a mejorar el proceso de consentimiento informado, a través de técnicas que mejoren la explicación por parte del profesional de salud y la comprensión del participante o paciente.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.Aes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.udca.edu.co/index.php/ruadc/article/view/1164/1802
dc.relationhttps://revistas.udca.edu.co/index.php/ruadc/article/view/1164/1834
dc.relation/*ref*/AL-SAADOON, M.; AL-ADAWI, S. 2019. Informed Consent in societies with different ethos of ‘selfhood’. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 19(1): e1. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2019.19.01.001
dc.relation/*ref*/ÁLVAREZ, S. 2015. La autonomía personal y la autonomía relacional. Anal. filos. 35(1):13-26.
dc.relation/*ref*/ANNAS, G.J. 2018. Beyond Nazi war crimes experiments: the voluntary consent requirement of the Nuremberg Code at 70. Am J Public Health. 108(1):42-46. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304103
dc.relation/*ref*/AVEYARD, H. 2005. Informed consent prior to nursing care procedures. Nurs Ethics. 12(1):19-29. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733005ne755oa
dc.relation/*ref*/BEAUCHAMP, T.L.; CHILDRESS, J.F. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, USA. 417p.
dc.relation/*ref*/BESKOW, L.M.; FRIEDMAN, J.Y.; HARDY, N.C.; LIN, L.; WEINFURT, K.P. 2010. Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking. PLoS One. 5(10):e13302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013302
dc.relation/*ref*/BOGOD, D. 2004. The Nazi hypothermia experiments: forbidden data? Anaesthesia. 59(12):1155-1156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04034.x
dc.relation/*ref*/BREESE, P.E.; BURMAN, W.J.; GOLDBERG, S.; WEIS, S.E. 2007. Education level, primary language, and comprehension of the informed consent process. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2(4):69-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619831888
dc.relation/*ref*/CAÑETE, R.; GUILÑHEM, D.; BRITO, K. 2012. Consentimiento informado: algunas consideraciones actuales. Acta Bioethica. 18(1):121-127. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2012000100011
dc.relation/*ref*/CARREÑO-DUEÑAS, J.A. 2016. Consentimiento informado en investigación clínica: un proceso dinámico. Pers.bioét. 20(2):232-243. https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2016.20.2.8
dc.relation/*ref*/CHUAIRE, L.; SÁNCHEZ, M.C. 2007. Platón y el consentimiento informado contemporáneo. Colomb. Med. 38(3):297-300.
dc.relation/*ref*/CLIFFORD, T. 2013. Informed consent—role of the perianesthesia nurse. J. Perianesth. Nurs. 28(6):413-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2013.09.004
dc.relation/*ref*/DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS, Declaración Universal. Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Asamblea General del. 1948. 10.
dc.relation/*ref*/DHAI, A. 2014. The research ethics evolution: From Nuremberg to Helsinki. S Afr Med J. 104(3):178-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.7864
dc.relation/*ref*/ELLETT, L.; VILLEGAS, R.; BEISCHER, A.; ONG, N.; MAHER, P. 2014. Use of a multimedia module to aid the informed consent process in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy for pelvic pain: randomized controlled trial. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 21(4):602-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.002
dc.relation/*ref*/ESCOBAR LÓPEZ, M.T.; CARRERA CELIS, C.A. 2015. Percepción sobre consentimiento informado en pacientes de cuatro diferentes áreas de atención en salud en Bogotá, Colombia. Rev. Latinoam. Bioet. 15(1):14-25.
dc.relation/*ref*/ESCUDERO CARRETERO, M.J.; GARCÍA TOYOS, N.; MARTÍN BARATO, A.I.; RUIZ AZAROLA, A.; PÉREZ CORRAL, O.; PRIETO RODRÍGUEZ, M.A.; SUESS SCHWEND, A. 2017. Valoración de aspectos éticos y metodológicos en un estudio cualitativo con personas usuarias de Oncología Pediátrica. EMPIRIA. 36:149-176. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.36.2017.17863
dc.relation/*ref*/FAIRCHILD, A.L.; BAYER, R. 1999. Uses and abuses of Tuskegee. Science. 284(5416):919-921. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5416.919
dc.relation/*ref*/FERNANDES, N.C. 2015. The writing of informed consent in accessible language: Difficulties. Rev. Colégio Bras. Cirurgiões. 42(3):197-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912015003013
dc.relation/*ref*/FLORY, J.; EMANUEL, E. 2004. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA. 292(13):1593-1601. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.13.1593
dc.relation/*ref*/GONZÁLEZ-LÓPEZ, E.; RÍOS-CORTÉS, R. 2016. Visiting holocaust-related sites with medical students as an aid in teaching medical ethics. IMAJ. 18(5):257-260.
dc.relation/*ref*/GROOTENS-WIEGERS, P.; DE VRIES, M.C.; VAN BEUSEKOM, M.M.; VAN DIJCK, L.; VAN DEN BROEK, J.M. 2015. Comic strips help children understand medical research: targeting the informed consent procedure to children's needs. Patient Educ. Couns. 98(4):518-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.005
dc.relation/*ref*/GUIX OLIVER, J.; BALAÑÀ FORT, L.; CARBONELL RIERA, J.M.; SIMÓN PÉREZ, R.; SURROCA MACIÀ, R.M.; NUALART BERBEL, L. 1999. Cumplimiento y percepción del consentimiento informado en un sector sanitario de Cataluña. Rev. Esp. Salud Pública. 73:669-675.
dc.relation/*ref*/HADZIABDIC, E.; HEIKKILÄ, K.; ALBIN, B.; HJELM, K. 2011. Problems and consequences in the use of professional interpreters: qualitative analysis of incidents from primary healthcare. Nurs Inq. 18(3):253-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00542.x
dc.relation/*ref*/HALKOAHO, A.; PIETILÄ, A.M.; EBBESEN, M.; KARKI, S.; KANGASNIEMI, M. 2016. Cultural aspects related to informed consent in health research: A systematic review. Nurs. Ethics. 23(6):698-712.
dc.relation/*ref*/HOOVER-REGAN, M.; BECKER, T.; WILLIAMS, M.J.; SHENKER, Y. 2013. Informed consent and research subject understanding of clinical trials. WMJ. 112(1):18-23.
dc.relation/*ref*/HUNT, L.M.; DE VOOGD, K.B. 2007. Are good intentions good enough? Informed consent without trained interpreters. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 22(5):598-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0136-1
dc.relation/*ref*/KARAN, A.; SOMASUNDARAM, P.; MICHAEL, H.; SHAYEGANI, A.; MAYER, H. 2014. The effect of multimedia interventions on the informed consent process for cataract surgery in rural South India. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 62(2):171-175. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.116488
dc.relation/*ref*/KARLINER, L.S.; JACOBS, E.A.; CHEN, A.H.; MUTHA, S. 2007. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 42(2):727-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00629.x
dc.relation/*ref*/KATZ, J. 1996. The Nuremberg code and the Nuremberg trial: A reappraisal. JAMA. 276(20):1662-1666. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540200048030
dc.relation/*ref*/KHABOUR, O.F.; ALOMARI, M.A.; AL-SHEYAB, N.A. 2017. Parental perceptions about informed consent/assent in pediatric research in Jordan. J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics. 12(4):261-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617718937
dc.relation/*ref*/KOTTOW, M. 2014. De Helsinki a Fortaleza: una Declaración desangrada. Rev. Bioét. 22(1):28-33.
dc.relation/*ref*/KOTTOW, M. 2016. El consentimiento informado en clínica: inquietudes persistentes. Rev. Med. Chile. 144(11):1459-1463. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872016001100012
dc.relation/*ref*/LAD, P.M.; DAHL, R. 2014. Overcoming language barriers in the informed consent process: Regulatory and compliance issues with the use of the “Short Form”. Accountability in Research Policies and Quality Assurance. 21(5):315-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.848801
dc.relation/*ref*/LIN, Y.K.; LIU, K.T.; CHEN, C.W.; LEE, W.C.; LIN, C.J.; SHI, L.; TIEN, Y.C. 2019. How to effectively obtain informed consent in trauma patients: a systematic review. BMC medical ethics. 20(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0347-0
dc.relation/*ref*/LÓPEZ-MUÑOZ, F.; ALAMO, C.; GARCÍA-GARCÍA, P.; MOLINA, J.D.; RUBIO, G. 2008. The role of psychopharmacology in the medical abuses of the Third Reich: From euthanasia programmes to human experimentation. Brain Res. Bull. 77(6):388-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.09.002
dc.relation/*ref*/MALIK, L.; MEJIA, A. 2014. Informed consent for phase I oncology trials: form, substance and signature. J. Clin Med Res. 6(3):205-208. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr1803w
dc.relation/*ref*/MANZINI, J.L. 2000. Declaración de Helsinki: principios éticos para la investigación médica sobre sujetos humanos. Acta Bioethica. 6(2):321-334.
dc.relation/*ref*/MENENDEZ, J.B. 2013. Informed consent: essential legal and ethical principles for nurses. JONA´S healthcare law, ethics regulation. 15(4):140-144. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHL.0000000000000015
dc.relation/*ref*/NELSON-MARTEN, P.; RICH, B.A. 1999. A historical perspective of informed consent in clinical practice and research. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 15(2):81-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-2081(99)80065-5
dc.relation/*ref*/OSUJI, P.I. 2018. Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent. Med Health Care and Philos. 21(1):101-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9789-7
dc.relation/*ref*/PORRINO, P.; FALCONE, Y.; AGOSTA, L.; ISAIA, G.; ZANOCCHI, M.; MASTRAPASQUA, A.; ISAIA, G.; BO, M. 2015. Informed Consent in Older Medical Inpatients: Assessment of Decision‐Making Capacity. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 63(11):2423-2424. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13810
dc.relation/*ref*/POTTER, V.R. 1970. Bioethics, the science of survival. Perspect. Biol. Med. 14(1):127-153. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1970.0015
dc.relation/*ref*/PRUSACZYK, B.; CHERNEY, S.M.; CARPENTER, C.R.; DUBOIS, J.M. 2017. Informed consent to research with cognitively impaired adults: transdisciplinary challenges and opportunities. Clinical Gerontologist. 40(1):63-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2016.1201714
dc.relation/*ref*/RATHOR, M.Y.; SHAH, A.; HASMONI, M.H. 2016. Is Autonomy a Universal Value of Human Existence? Scope of Autonomy in Medical Practice: A Comparative Study between Western Medical Ethics and Islamic Medical Ethics. Int. Med. J. 15(1):81-88.
dc.relation/*ref*/REVERBY, S.M. 2016. Restorative justice and restorative history for the sexually transmitted disease inoculation experiments in Guatemala. Am. J. Public Health. 106(7):1163-1164. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303205
dc.relation/*ref*/RICE, T.W. 2008. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir Care. 53(10):1325-1329.
dc.relation/*ref*/RODRÍGUEZ, M.A.; GARCÍA, R. 2013. First, do no harm: the US sexually transmitted disease experiments in Guatemala. Am J Public Health, 103(12):2122-2126. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301520
dc.relation/*ref*/ROGERS, C.G.; TYSON, J.E.; KENNEDY, K.A.; BROYLES, R.S.; HICKMAN, J.F. 1998. Conventional consent with opting in versus simplified consent with opting out: an exploratory trial for studies that do not increase patient risk. J. Pediatr. 132(4):606-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70347-6
dc.relation/*ref*/ROSSE, P.A.; KREBS, L.U. 1999. The nurse's role in the informed consent process. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 15(2):116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-2081(99)80069-2
dc.relation/*ref*/SABBATANI, S. 2013. The infectious diseases experiments conducted on human guinea pigs by Nazis in concentration camps. Infez. Med. 21(2):151-166.
dc.relation/*ref*/SANDVIK, A.; LIE, A.K. 2016. Untreated syphilis-from Oslo to Tuskegee. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 136(23-24):2010-2016. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.16.0543
dc.relation/*ref*/SASS, H.M. 2007. Fritz Jahr's 1927 concept of bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 17(4):279-295. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2008.0006
dc.relation/*ref*/SILVER, J.R. 2011. Karl Gebhardt (1897–1948): A lost man. J. R. Coll. Physicians Edinb. 41(4):366-371. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2011.417
dc.relation/*ref*/SIMS, J.M. 2010. A brief review of the Belmont report. Dimens. Crit, Care Nurs. 29(4):173-174.
dc.relation/*ref*/SIMKULET, W. 2017. Informed consent and nudging. Bioethics. 333:169-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12449
dc.relation/*ref*/SOOD, A.; GUPTA, J. 2018. Patient counselling and consent. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 46:43-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.10.002
dc.relation/*ref*/SPENCER, S.P.; STONER, M.J.; KELLEHER, K.; COHEN, D.M. 2015. Using a multimedia presentation to enhance informed consent in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 31(8): 572-576. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000513
dc.relation/*ref*/SSALI, A.; POLAND, F.; SEELEY, J. 2015. Volunteer experiences and perceptions of the informed consent process: Lessons from two HIV clinical trials in Uganda. BMC Med Ethics. 16(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0073-1
dc.relation/*ref*/SUÁREZ-OBANDO, F. 2016. Consentimiento informado como criterio de inclusión ¿confusión conceptual, manipulación, discriminación o coerción? Pers. Bioét. 20(2):244-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/PEBI.2016.20.2.9
dc.relation/*ref*/SUSILO, A.P.; DALEN, J.V.; CHENAULT, M.N.; SCHERPBIER, A. 2014. Informed consent and nurses’ roles: a survey of Indonesian practitioners. Nurs. Ethics. 21(6):684-694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733014531524
dc.relation/*ref*/SYNNOT, A.; RYAN, R.; PRICTOR, M.; FETHERSTONHAUGH, D.; PARKER, B. 2014. Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 9(5):CD003717. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub3
dc.relation/*ref*/VERA CARRASCO, O. 2016. El consentimiento informado del paciente en la actividad asistencial médica. Rev. Méd. La Paz. 22(1):59-68.
dc.relation/*ref*/VOLLMANN, J.; WINAU, R. 1996. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. BMJ. 313(7070):1445-1449. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1445
dc.relation/*ref*/WALTER, J.K.; ROSS, L.F. 2014. Relational autonomy: moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism. Pediatrics. 133(Supplement 1):S16-S23. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3608D
dc.relation/*ref*/WEST, E.; STUCKELBERGER, A.; PAUTEX, S.; STAAKS, J.; GYSELS, M. 2017. Operationalising ethical challenges in dementia research—a systematic review of current evidence. Age Ageing. 46(4):678-687. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw250
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2019 Andrés Camargo Sánchez, Jessica Olmos, Elkin Higuera-Dagovett, Rafael Vargas, Ruth Barretoes-ES
dc.sourceRevista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2019): Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica. July-Decemberen-US
dc.sourceRevista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (2019): Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica. Julio-Diciembrees-ES
dc.sourceRevista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica; v. 22 n. 2 (2019): Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica. Julho-Dezembropt-BR
dc.source2619-2551
dc.source0123-4226
dc.source10.31910/rudca.v22.n2.2019
dc.subjectéticaes-ES
dc.subjectconsentimiento informadoes-ES
dc.subjecthistoriaes-ES
dc.subjectprácticaes-ES
dc.subjectinvestigaciónes-ES
dc.subjectethicsen-US
dc.subjectinformed consenten-US
dc.subjecthistoryen-US
dc.subjectpracticeen-US
dc.subjectresearchen-US
dc.titleRole of health professionals in the design, obtention and understanding of informed consent: A reviewen-US
dc.titlePapel de los profesionales de la salud en el diseño, obtención y entendimiento del consentimiento informado: Una revisiónes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución