dc.creatorBatz Lineiro, Aglaya
dc.creatorMontes de la Barrera, José Orlando
dc.creatorRomero Ochoa, Jhon Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-24T17:08:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-25T16:27:03Z
dc.date.available2023-08-24T17:08:53Z
dc.date.available2023-08-25T16:27:03Z
dc.date.created2023-08-24T17:08:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.12804/urosario9789585001848
dc.identifier9789585001831
dc.identifier9789585001848
dc.identifierhttps://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/40739
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8437538
dc.description.abstractA significant portion of the labor market in the countries of the Global South consists of the informal population. In Colombia alone, informality represented 58.2% of the labor force between September and November 2022. Moreover, considering the role of social capital in markets and the social interactions of various population groups, as well as access to financing in the inclusion of market dynamics and promotion of entrepreneurial ecosystems, it is necessary to analyze the heterogeneity present in the levels of well-being, social capital, financial access, and technological progress to establish policies aimed at reducing socioeconomic differences in terms of employment, nationality, gender, and socioeconomic groups. Thus, the book seeks to analyze different characteristics, assessments, and behaviors regarding social welfare, social capital, financial inclusion, and technological use in different informal subgroups based on (i) occupation (street vendors, recyclers, and home-based vendors), (ii) gender (men, women, or others), (iii) nationality (Colombians and migrants), and (iv) age (young people under 30 years old and people over 30 years).
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherEditorial Universidad del Rosario
dc.publisherEconomía
dc.relationhttps://editorial.urosario.edu.co/catalog/product/view/id/7344/s/gpd-caracterizando-la-informalidad-un-analisis-sobre-migracion-genero-jovenes-educacion-y-tecnologia-en-la-informalidad-9789585001831-64c2ec75a70da/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAbierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.sourceAbramo, L. (2022). Policies to address the challenges of existing and new forms of informality in Latin America. Naciones Unidas. https://repositorio.cepal.org/ handle/11362/47774
dc.sourceAcolin, A., Chattaraj, S., & Wachter, S. M. (2016). Urban governance and development of informality in China and India. En E. L. Birch, S. Chattaraj, & S. M. Wachter (Eds.), Slums: How informal real estate markets work (pp. 4-23). University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812292572-00
dc.sourceAdams, D. W., & Nehman, G. I. (1979). Borrowing costs and the demand for rural credit. The Journal of Development Studies, 15(2), 165-176. https://doi. org/10.1080/00220387908421712
dc.sourceAgudelo, D. A. (2022). Una introducción a los conceptos y aplicaciones [working paper]. Center for Research in Economics and Finance. https://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3297121
dc.sourceÁlvarez, C., & Urbano, D. (2011). Environmental factors and entrepreneurial activity in Latin America. Academia. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, (48), 126-139.
dc.sourceAmuzu, D. (2018). Environmental injustice of informal e-waste recycling in Agbogbloshie-Accra: Urban political ecology perspective. Local Environment, 23(6), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1456515
dc.sourceAnjara, S. G., Nellums, L. B., Bonetto, C., & Van Bortel, T. (2017). Stress, health and quality of life of female migrant domestic workers in Singapore: A cross-sectional study. bmc Women’s Health, 17(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12905-017-0442-7
dc.sourceArslan, A. (2020). Labour informality, patriarchal gender regimes and neoliberalism in Turkey. En S. Huang, & K. N. Ruwanpura (Eds.), Handbook on gender in Asia (pp. 167-184). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi. org/10.4337/9781788112918.00018
dc.sourceAsibey, M. O., Lykke, A. M., & King, R. S. (2020). Understanding the factors for increased informal electronic waste recycling in Kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 32(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080 /09603123.2020.1755016
dc.sourceAttanasio, O., Goldberg, P. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2004). Trade reforms and wage inequality in Colombia. Journal of Development Economics, 74(2), 331-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.07.001
dc.sourceBacha, S., & Azouzi, M. A. (2019). How gender and emotions bias the credit deci sion-making in banking firms. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 22, 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2019.03.004
dc.sourceBain, K., & Hicks, N. (1998). Building social capital and reaching out to excluded groups: The challenge of partnerships. World Bank, 15(1), 13-25.
dc.sourceBaker, H. K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N., & Gaur, V. (2019). How financial literacy and demographic variables relate to behavioral biases. Managerial Finance, 45(1), 124-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-01-2018-0003
dc.sourceBal, C. S. (2015). Dealing with deportability: Deportation laws and the political personhood of temporary migrant workers in Singapore. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 2(2), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2015.17
dc.sourceBanco Mundial. (2008). Finance for all? Policies and pitfalls in expanding access. https:// openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6905
dc.sourceBanco Mundial. (2012). whoqol: Measuring quality of life. https://www.who.int/ tools/whoqol
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.sourcereponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
dc.subjectInclusión
dc.subjectOcupaciones
dc.subjectMercado
dc.subjectEcosistema emprendedor
dc.subjectGrupos poblacionales
dc.titleCaracterizando la informalidad. Un análisis sobra la migración, el género, los jóvenes, la educación y la tecnología en la informalidad
dc.typebook


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución