dc.creatorDescalzi, Constanza A
dc.creatorLópez-Campbell, Ignacio Fernando
dc.creatorKemp, Peter D
dc.creatorOrdoñez-Vásquez, Iván
dc.creatorDorner, J
dc.date2018-08-23T13:40:27Z
dc.date2022-06-17T20:21:35Z
dc.date2018-08-23T13:40:27Z
dc.date2022-06-17T20:21:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T22:23:35Z
dc.date.available2023-08-21T22:23:35Z
dc.identifier1130795
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10533/219513
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/8289748
dc.descriptionLow sustainability and short persistence of renovated pastures are main issues for pastoral 6 production systems. Pasture establishment and production were evaluated following 7 different pasture improvement methods. On a naturalised degraded pasture (control, 8 NFNP), Valdivia, Chile, treatments of fertilised naturalised pasture (FNP), cultivated 9 pasture (Lolium perenne [Lp]) and Trifolium repens [Tr]), direct-drilled pasture (Lp and Tr) 10 and diverse direct-drilled pasture (Lp, Bromus valdivianus [Bv], Holcus lanatus [Hl], 11 Dactylis glomerata [Dg] and Tr) were established in autumn, 2013, and evaluated within a 12 completely randomized block design until autumn, 2014. The trial was grazed by sheep. 13 Soil fertility levels, seedling establishment and development, pasture growth, herbage mass 14 and botanical composition were analysed using ANOVA, LSD and Canonical Variate 15 Analysis. As a result of liming and fertiliser application soil aluminium saturation was low, 16 Olsen-P medium and exchangeable potassium high. At 110 days after sowing, Lp had 17 greater tillering than other grass species (P≤0.001; number of tillers/plant (mean±sem; 18 n=3): Lp 38.8± 1.1a, Bv 18.4± 3.0b, Dg 10.0± 1.6c, Hl 19.4± 1.2b) and its development 19 and production at plant level was similar in all sowing methods. The total leaf area of the 20 sown species was similar for all sowing methods and the improved pastures had a greater 21 maximum pasture growth rate than NFNP (P≤0.05; kg DM/ha per day (mean±sem; n=3): 22 FNP: 104±8.8a, CP: 89±9.7a, DP: 89±12.2a, DDP: 68±6.7b, NFNP: 39±3.1c) but differed 23 in their growth distribution across seasons. The accumulated herbage mass for the year was 24 similar for all improved pasture treatments (P≤0.001; kg DM/ha (mean±sem; n=3): FNP: Page 1 of 42 Journal of Agricultural Science For Review Only 8089±512.5a, CP: 7499±618.1a, DP: 7302±663.8a, DDP: 25 6729±498.5a, NFNP: 26 4069±234.3b). In conclusion, direct-drilling and pasture cultivation appeared to give a good 27 pasture establishment. At the seedling stage, Lp was faster growing than neighbouring 28 species. Increasing species diversity diminished the seasonality of pasture growth. All 29 pasture improvement methods gave a higher total yield than the degraded pasture, but the 30 FNP required no soil disturbance or risk of poor establishment. Also they stimulate the 31 spontaneous colonisation and growth of fast growing species improving agronomical and 32 ecological pasture features. 33 34 Additional keywords: Pasture renovation, tillage, direct-drilling, pasture condition, 35 diversity, CSR pasture model
dc.description43
dc.languageeng
dc.relationinstname: Conicyt
dc.relationreponame: Repositorio Digital RI2.0
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement//1130795
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/dataset/hdl.handle.net/10533/93482
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
dc.titleShort term sustainability of pasture restoration improvement methods for degraded permanent pastures
dc.typeManuscrito
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/text


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución