dc.creatorANDREA ESTEFANIA JARAMILLO DUQUE;617709
dc.creatorJaramillo Duque, Andrea Estefania;617709
dc.date2017-01-19T18:56:53Z
dc.date2017-01-19T18:56:53Z
dc.date2016-08
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-17T20:27:56Z
dc.date.available2023-07-17T20:27:56Z
dc.identifierAgregar la carrera y/o programa académico a la que pertenece la obra. AGREGAR A LA QUE PERTENEZCA
dc.identifierhttps://repositorioinstitucional.uaslp.mx/xmlui/handle/i/4120
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7515280
dc.descriptionProtected areas have been created as a tool to stop habitat loss and provide help in biodiversity conservation. They are essential for the conservation of cultural heritage, promoting cultural values and encouraging sustainable practices of land use. The goods and services that these spaces provide are essential for society and life. They are important for the sustainable development of local communities. Furthermore, they are essential for recreation, tourism, and education; they also contribute to local and regional economies. With this background, two protected areas were analyzed: Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve (RBSAT - for Mexico) and Yasuni National Park (PNY - for Ecuador). Both areas face a number of threats; in PNY´s case, the main concern is related to the oil extraction activities developed within the area. In the case of RBSAT, the main threats include: fires, illegal hunting, changes in land use, extraction of wildlife, among others. Although management tools exist in both areas (programs or plans), they still face high external pressure. For this reason, evaluating each area´s main characteristics and performance was fundamental. In order to accomplish it, a framework analysis was performed, including important information regarding: the countries, the systems of protected areas and the selected areas. A comparison of legal frameworks was necessary to detail the legal documents at different administrative levels (international, national/federal, provincial/state, districts/municipal/ and parishes/local). It was also required to employ the “Kelsen Pyramid”, in order to organize legal documents and establish supremacy. Employing an evaluation of management effectiveness was important to monitor each area´s performance. Finally, a SWOT analysis was developed. Ultimately, it was possible to understand the future steps required to strengthen the organization in both areas. As a result of the comparison between the areas’ realities, backgrounds, management tools, legal documents and performances, several recommendations were detailed at the end of this study. This will facilitate decision-making processes for authorities and reinforce the areas´ management.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAgenda Ambiental
dc.relationInvestigadores
dc.relationEstudiantes
dc.relationversión publicada
dc.relationREPOSITORIO NACIONAL CONACYT
dc.rightsAcceso Abierto
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectEcuador
dc.subjectMexico
dc.subjectprotected areas
dc.subjectKelsen Pyramid
dc.subjectSWOT analysis
dc.subjectmanagement effectiveness
dc.subject1 CIENCIAS FISICO MATEMATICAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA TIERRA
dc.titleA comparison between two management systems of protected areas from México (Sierra del Abra Tanchipa Biosphere Reserve) and from Ecuador (Yasuni National Park)
dc.typeTesis de Maestria


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución