dc.contributorPalerm, J., Department of Project Engineering, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico; Aceves, C., Corporate Environmental Law, Universidad de Guadalajara, Universidad Panamericana, Guadalajara, Mexico
dc.creatorPalerm, J.
dc.creatorAceves, C.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-15T17:53:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-04T00:54:45Z
dc.date.available2015-09-15T17:53:44Z
dc.date.available2023-07-04T00:54:45Z
dc.date.created2015-09-15T17:53:44Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-3543050731&partnerID=40&md5=f0f9ff73ec5b3ed1937347abe307b97d
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/41253
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7255605
dc.description.abstractAlthough Mexico has nominally been a democracy for nearly a century, it may at best be described as a 'consolidating' democracy. This status of the political system is clearly reflected in its EIA legislation, particularly with regard to the 'participatory' and 'pluricultural' dimensions, which relate, in broad terms, to an incipient civil society, limited public participation and inadequate integration of indigenous peoples. This paper analyses Mexico's EIA legislation under these two dimensions of democracy and makes recommendations on how it should be amended to respond to the challenges of a consolidated democratic system, such as: broadening opportunities for public participation; making the system more accountable; and seeking legitimate means to integrate indigenous peoples and traditional knowledge in the EIA process. IAIA 2004.
dc.relationScopus
dc.relationImpact Assessment and Project Appraisal
dc.relation22
dc.relation2
dc.relation99
dc.relation108
dc.titleEnvironmental impact assessment in Mexico: An analysis from a 'consolidating democracy' perspective
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución