dc.contributorJohnstone, J., Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Division of Infectious Diseases, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Loeb, M., Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Division of Infectious Diseases, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Teo, K.K., Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Division of Infectious Diseases, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Gao, P., Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Dyal, L., Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Liu, L., Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Hypertension, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China; Avezum, A., Research Division, Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Cardona-Munoz, E., Department of Physiology, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico; Sleight, P., Cardiovascular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; Fagard, R., Hypertension Unit, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Yusuf, S., Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Division of Infectious Diseases, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
dc.creatorJohnstone, J.
dc.creatorLoeb, M.
dc.creatorTeo, K.K.
dc.creatorGao, P.
dc.creatorDyal, L.
dc.creatorLiu, L.
dc.creatorAvezum, A.
dc.creatorCardona-Munoz, E.
dc.creatorSleight, P.
dc.creatorFagard, R.
dc.creatorYusuf, S.
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-19T18:50:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-04T00:51:04Z
dc.date.available2015-11-19T18:50:32Z
dc.date.available2023-07-04T00:51:04Z
dc.date.created2015-11-19T18:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/65620
dc.identifier10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.071100
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863981710&partnerID=40&md5=72c90bb5cbf7fdf14cd88c942c824825
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/7255354
dc.description.abstractBackground-We sought to determine the association between influenza vaccination and major adverse vascular events because the association remains uncertain. Methods and Results-A total of 31 546 participants were enrolled from 40 countries. Eligibility included age ≥55 years and known vascular disease. The primary outcome was a composite of death resulting from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke during 4 influenza seasons (2003-2007). Influenza vaccination was associated with a lower risk of the outcome during 3 influenza seasons (defined using World Health Organization FluNet reports): 2004 to 2005 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.77), 2005 to 2006 (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91), and 2006 to 2007 (adjusted OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42-0.65), the same years that circulating influenza matched the vaccine antigen. In 2003 to 2004, there was an incomplete match between circulating influenza and the vaccine antigen, and there was no association between influenza vaccination and the outcome (adjusted OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.73-1.27). However, tests of potential biases in the analyses revealed associations between influenza vaccination and outcome during noninfluenza seasons except 2003 to 2004. The summary ORs in the influenza season (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58-0.74]) and noninfluenza season (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.76) were almost identical. The reduction in risk of noncardiovascular death associated with the influenza vaccine ranged from 73% to 79%. Conclusion-Although initial analyses suggest that influenza vaccination was associated with reduced risk of major adverse vascular events during influenza seasons when the influenza vaccine matched the circulating virus, sensitivity analyses revealed that risk of bias remained. A randomized trial is needed to definitively address this question. © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.
dc.relationCirculation
dc.relation126
dc.relation3
dc.relation278
dc.relation286
dc.relationScopus
dc.relationWOS
dc.titleInfluenza vaccination and major adverse vascular events in high-risk patients
dc.typeArticle


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución